MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388499081 · doi:10.15690/vsp.v22i5.2641

Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

2023· article· en· W4388499081 sur OpenAlex
Leyla S. Namazova-Baranova, Eduard T. Ambarchyan, Vladislav V. Ivanchikov, Anastasia D. Kuzminova, A. G. Shandra, Еlena A. Vishneva, Grigory V. Revunenkov, Kirill A. Valyalov

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueВопросы современной педиатрии · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Établissements canadiensChildren’s Health Research Institute
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineUstekinumabPsoriasisSecukinumabAdalimumabPsoriasis Area and Severity IndexPlaque psoriasisInternal medicineDermatologySurgeryPsoriatic arthritisDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background. Psoriasis is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). One of the markers associated with the CVD course is epicardial fatty tissue (EFT) that is thicker in psoriasis patients. EFT assessment can be used as a useful indicator of CVD in psoriasis patients. The data about the effect of genetically engineered biological therapy (GEBT), used for psoriasis management, on the EFT thickness is limited. Examination of GEBT effects on EFT may improve our understanding of CVD prevention in psoriasis patients. Objective. The aim of the study is to study the changes in EFT thickness on GEBT. Methods. A prospective cohort study included 56 children with severe and moderate psoriasis. Patients underwent transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography (M-mode) with EFT thickness assessment and PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) scoring before the GEBT initiation. All the parameters were re-evaluated after 16 weeks. All patients were divided into three groups according to the initiated therapy: adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab. When dividing the therapy received into groups, the age of the patients was taken into account: inclusion in the adalimumab group was carried out from 4 years, in the secukinumab and ustekinumab groups — from 6 years. Otherwise, the process of group assignment was random. The study results were processed using descriptive statistics methods: the changes in EFT thickness in individual groups were compared via the Wilcoxon test, and results were considered statistically significant at p 0.05. Results. Before the start of therapy, in 56 patients the mean of EFT thickness was 2.11 mm, the mean PASI — 18.32. The adalimumab group had the following indicators: the mean EFT thickness before the therapy was 2.1 mm, and it has decreased to 1.77 mm after 16 weeks of therapy. The mean change in EFT thickness was 0.33 mm, and the median — 0.17 mm [CI 0.33 ± 0.25]. The ustekinumab group: the mean EFT thickness before the therapy was 2.13 mm, 16 weeks after — 1.69 mm. The mean change in EFT thickness was 0.44 mm, and the median — 0.38 [CI 0.44 ± 0.13]. The secukinumab group: the mean EFT thickness before the therapy was 2.08 mm, 16 weeks after — 1.82 mm. The mean change in EFT thickness was 0.27 mm, and the median — 0.27 [CI 0.27 ± 0.07]. Evaluation of indicators via Wilcoxon test has shown statistically significant decrease in the EFT after therapy in all groups (p 0.05). 73% of patients achieved PASI 50, and 6% — PASI 75 in the adalimumab group. 21% of patients did not achieve PASI 50. The mean PASI score before therapy was 16.73 points, and after 16 ± 4 weeks — 6.4 points, the mean dynamics was 10.33 points, the median dynamics was 7 points [CI 10.33 ± 4]. All patients achieved PASI 50, 75.3% — PASI 75, 8% — PASI 90, and 16.7% — PASI 100 in the ustekinumab group. The mean PASI score before therapy was 22.17 points, and after 16 weeks — 3.67 points, the mean dynamics was 19.28 points, the median dynamics was 17 points [CI 18.5 ± 3.03]. All patients achieved PASI 50, 47% — PASI 75, and 11% — PASI 90 in the secukinumab group. The median PASI before therapy was 14.29 points, and after 16 ± 4 weeks — 3.71 points, the mean PASI score before therapy was 14.29 points, and after 16 weeks — 3.7 points, the mean dynamics was 10.59 points, the median dynamics was 10 points [CI 10.59 ± 2.27]. Evaluation of indicators via Wilcoxon test has shown statistically significant decrease in the PASI after therapy in all groups (p 0.05). There were no adverse events leading to cessation of therapy during the follow-up period. Conclusion. All groups have shown decrease in the in EFT thickness and in the PASI score. The most significant dynamics was observed in the ustekinumab group. Research limitations were the small patients sample and the absence of a control group (participants without psoriasis).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,057
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,536

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,123
Tête enseignante GPT0,413
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle