Hope in a Collapsing World: Youth, Theatre, and Listening as a Political Alternative by Kathleen Gallagher and Andrew Kushnir (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Hope in a Collapsing World: Youth, Theatre, and Listening as a Political Alternative by Kathleen Gallagher and Andrew Kushnir Caitlin A. Kane Hope in a Collapsing World: Youth, Theatre, and Listening as a Political Alternative. By Kathleen Gallagher with Andrew Kushnir. University of Toronto Press, 2022. Paper $39.95. 424 pages. 34 illustrations. What can theatre offer young people living in a seemingly perpetual state of crisis? Why does theatre education matter in an era characterized by political polarization, racial and economic inequality, and climate change? These are some of the questions that Kathleen Gallagher and Andrew Kushnir take up in Hope in a Collapsing World: Youth, Theatre, and Listening as a Political Alternative. Following an ambitious five-year ethnographic study carried out at five sites around the world, Gallagher and Kushnir offer a compelling defense of theatre education’s relevance in the twenty-first century and a useful model for interdisciplinary ethnographic research with and about young people. Hope in a Collapsing World pairs Gallagher’s insights as the lead social scientist for the Radical Hope Project (the name that she and her colleagues gave their five-year study) with Kushnir’s verbatim play, Towards Youth, which transforms his observations from the study into a moving exploration of relational ethics in educational theatre and ethnographic research. The book is divided into two parts. Part 1 consists of seven chapters focused on Gallagher’s findings and part 2 includes Kushnir’s critical introduction to his play and the script used for its 2019 premiere. In a brief prologue, Gallagher lays out her primary claims and describes her motivations for writing Hope in a Collapsing World, which is the second monograph to result from the Radical Hope Project. While the first monograph, Global Youth Citizenry and Radical Hope: Enacting Community-Engaged Research through Performative Methodologies, features chapters by scholars from the study’s five research sites, this new text centers Gallagher’s perspective and challenges readers to reconsider how theatre education contributes to students’ civic development. Gallagher’s research suggests that, although we often focus on theatre’s ability to instill confidence in young people, the value of educational theatre stems from its ability to reduce students’ insecurity. She contends that a sense of security enables young people to tune in and respond to the needs of those around them. Chapters 1, 2, and 3 describe the Radical Care Project in depth. In chapter 1, Gallagher provides a literature review focused on the role that listening and care play in democratic processes. In chapter 2, she describes each of the five sites involved in the study: an after-school program for junior high students in Athens, Greece; an all-girls school that uses drama throughout the curriculum in Lucknow, India; a youth theatre group associated with the University of Warwick in Coventry, England; a university drama program in Tainan, Taiwan; and a high school drama classroom in Toronto, Canada. Despite the differences across these sites, the young people who participated in the study all faced systemic issues [End Page 86] that created a sense of precarity in their lives. In chapter 3, Gallagher details the collaborative ethnographic research methods that she and her colleagues used and outlines their research objectives. In chapters 4, 5, and 6, Gallagher provides a thematically organized overview of the study’s qualitative results. Each chapter features an example of how young people at one of the research sites cultivated care, hope, or interdependency (the themes of the three chapters, respectively) and is supplemented with shorter anecdotes from some of the other sites. Offering detailed accounts of students in Greece who created imaginative theatrical works for young refugees and of teenagers in the United Kingdom who listened attentively to one another’s divergent views on the Brexit referendum, Gallagher demonstrates how acts of care inspire more hopeful understandings of oneself and of the world. In chapter 7, Gallagher summarizes the quantitative results gathered from a survey completed by participants at all five sites. Unlike the comparative framework used in many international studies that emphasizes researchers’ (in)ability to generalize across different sites, Gallagher and her colleagues developed a mixed-methods survey that aimed to “allow...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».