A Transatlantic Viewpoint on the Role of Pallidal Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For many neurologists, crossing borders during training is part of the trajectory to becoming a movement disorders specialist and offers novel insights.In this viewpoint, we discuss how crossing the Atlantic Ocean, moving from Europe to North America, changed our approach to choosing a deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD).Although the debate on whether the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the preferred target for DBS is no longer a hot topic and is possibly considered a solved controversy, a new debate has recently emerged, after the publication of the European guidelines on advanced therapies for PD.[1][2][3] Moreover, with the recent implementation of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), 4 which can also be used to target the GPi, pallidotomy (performed using either radiofrequency or MRgFUS) may gain traction again.Therefore, we believe that sharing our view would be of interest to readers on both sides of the Atlantic.STN DBS just celebrated its 30th anniversary in Grenoble, France, where it was introduced in the early 1990s.5 Pallidotomies were the preferred stereotactic intervention for advanced PD before the introduction of DBS. 6 Despite the fact that shortly after the first report of STN DBS was published, 5 a series of patients treated with GPi DBS were reported, 7 STN quickly became the target of choice for PD, and GPi DBS was performed primarily for dystonia.8 This was true especially in Europe, where DBS entered the clinical space prior to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval.In the past decade, several important clinical trials comparing STN to GPi were published.[9][10][11][12] Even though evidence has confirmed that both STN and GPi are effective targets in PD, 13 in Europe STN is still perceived as the DBS target of choice for PD, substantially outnumbering DBS procedures targeting the GPi.Despite our European training with STN being the preferred target, since arriving and practicing in Canada, each GPi case we have cared for has made us recognize why GPi as a target has been embraced in North America.Although the majority of patients respond well to STN DBS, 14 every DBS expert would concur that the potential outcome ranges between the miraculous effect often portrayed by the media, usually young tremordominant patients, and the disappointed patients in whom surgery and/or stimulation had a profound detrimental effect on speech, 15 cognition, 16 gait, and balance.17 Despite definite improvement in tremor and motor complications, 18 which is generally observed, the impact of these problems on function and quality of life makes these gains less significant.In contrast, the effect --------------------------
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,015 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».