MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388694533 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2023-bnpa.15

Nasa’s behavioural health and performance services for long duration space missions

2023· article· en· W4388694533 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles Dukes

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpaceflight effects on biology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAviation medicineAviationAeronauticsInternational Space StationAerospaceSurgeon generalMedicineEngineeringManagementMedical educationPublic healthNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dr. Charles Dukes is an Aerospace psychiatrist working with NASA’s behavioral health and performance operations group under the human health and performance contract at Johnson Space Center in Houston Texas. At NASA, Dr. Dukes provides operational behavioral health support to astronauts on the International Space Station. His other duties include, astronaut selection and he provides psychiatric support for NASA mission controllers, divers and other NASA personnel. Other NASA duties include working with the clinical and science team of Exploration Medical Capability. Dr. Dukes has a long history in the US Army where he serves as a flight surgeon and as the Army Reserve psychiatric consultant to the Surgeon General of the Army. His currently holds the rank of Colonel. Additionally, Dr. Dukes has had four combat deployments where he deployed as both a psychiatrist and flight surgeon. He also has worked with the Federal Aviation Administration for many years as an Aviation Medical Examiner and psychiatric consultant to the Federal Air Surgeon. Additionally, Dr. Dukes has many years working in medical education. He came to NASA from the University of Oklahoma where he served as psychiatry residency training director and Director of Consultation psychiatry services. He currently holds faculty appointments at the University of Oklahoma, University of Texas Medical Branch and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. Dr. Dukes is a Fellow in the American Psychiatric Association and holds memberships in the Aerospace Medical Association, Space Medical Association, and the Society of US Army Flight Surgeons. His current projects include publishing a paper on the efficacy and safety of SSRIs for long duration space missions. He is a co-author for the behavioral health chapter of the newest edition of Dr. Mike Barratt’s Principles of Clinical Medicine for Space Flight and he recently wrote the foreword for the latest edition of Dr. Nick Kanas’ book, Behavioral Health and Human Interactions in Space. Abstract We live in the age of long duration space missions. With the advent of missions lasting greater than 30 days on the International Space Station, to the commercial crew program and private astronaut missions, NASA’s Behavioral Health and Performance Operations Group remains an integral part of crew health and safety at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. The BHP group consists of a team of psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychological support personnel. The approach is a multifaceted career spanning behavioral health program which is involved in astronaut selection, astronaut candidate training, annual behavioral health evaluations, preflight training and exams, inflight support, inflight neurocognitive exams, postflight reintegration exams and elective behavioral health services. NASA’s behavioral health teams work very closely with our international partners from the European Space agency, Japanese Space agency, Russian Space Program, and the Canadian Space agency to provide cooperative behavioral health support to all astronauts who serve on the International Space Station. Every year there is a meeting of the International human health and behavior working group for spaceflight to ensure our efforts are coordinated and relevant to optimize crew health and safety. With long duration missions, there are unique stressors that crewmembers face in space and isolated and confined environments. Stressors include., physiologic adaptation to microgravity, circadian disruption, radiation exposure, environmental changes and psychological stressors related to separation from family and friends. As the missions change in duration and distance the risks increase in severity and new threats emerge related to changes in the environment (lunar gravity) and other unique stressors which will test the boundaries and limits of human performance. Additionally, when planning for long duration missions and the delivery of medical and behavioral health services there are certain unique limits such as communication delays as well as mass and volume constraints. To provide care for flight personnel through all phases of their career and training, NASA’s BHP team employs countermeasures which are focused on prevention, and mitigation of the risks of behavioral health problems in the unique environment of space. In this talk I will discuss the background and composition of NASA’s Behavioral Health and Performance Operations group. The elements of astronaut selection from the earliest classes to present will be discussed along with the composition of the selection team to include the psychological support service personnel which help connect astronauts to their families and friends. Additionally, the history of long duration missions with resultant physiologic and psychological stressors will be examined.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,135
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,451

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1350,031

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatryMême sujetSpaceflight effects on biologyTravaux en français237 207