MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388729157 · doi:10.1097/jw9.0000000000000115

Understanding perceptions of hair loss in hijab-wearing women: a pilot survey study

2023· article· en· W4388729157 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Lina Alhanshali, Fatima Bawany, Michael G. Buontempo, Jerry Shapiro, Kristen Lo Sicco

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal of Women’s Dermatology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHair Growth and Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNYU Grossman School of MedicineYork University
Mots-clésHair lossPerceptionPsychologyDermatologyMedicineNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

What is known about this subject in regard to women and their families? The hijab is a head covering worn by millions of Muslim women throughout the world and has been associated with alopecia. What is new from this article as messages for women and their families? Muslim women in this survey study self-reported alopecia related to the hijab. There are ways of mitigating the risks of alopecia or treating it without compromising religious beliefs or values. Dear Editors, The hijab, a religious head covering worn by millions of Muslim women globally, has been the subject of various discussions, including its potential association with hair loss. Studies have explored the occurrence of traction alopecia associated with religious head coverings.1–3 Regarding hijab use and hair loss, 1 study reported that the top 27 YouTube videos on the topic have garnered over 17 million views.4 The scientific literature on hijab-associated alopecia remains sparse, with an absence of studies examining Muslim women’s perspectives on hair loss. To bridge this gap, we conducted a 26-question electronic survey study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, among hijab-wearing Muslim women in New York City’s mosques, to comprehend their experiences with the hijab, alopecia, and healthcare-seeking behavior. The sample comprised 104 women, with a 90.6% response rate. The majority of the participants were between 18 and 25 years old (57.7%, n = 60/104), and nearly 90% had been wearing the hijab for 4 or more years (87.5%, n = 91/104) (Table 1). Table 1 - Styling practices and perceptions of hair loss in hijab-wearing women (N = 104) Variable n (%) Hours per day of hijab wear <3 hours 3 (2.9) 4–6 hours 28 (26.9) 7–9 hours 34 (32.7) 10–12 hours 24 (23.1) 13–16 hours 10 (9.6) 17–20 hours 1 (0.1) 21–24 hours 4 (3.8) Hairstyles worn under the hijab Low bun 76 (73.1) Low ponytail 7 (6.7) High bun 22 (21.2) High ponytail 3 (2.9) Braid 6 (5.8) Other/no response 6 (5.8) Use of undercap Yes 87 (83.7) No 15 (14.4) Other/no response 2 (1.9) Felt that hair was very important to self-identity 74 (71.8) Aware of hijab-associated hair loss Yes 65 (62.5) No 39 (37.5) Experienced hijab-associated hair loss 36 (34.6) If experienced hair loss, duration of hair loss >12 months 22 (61.1) Location of hair loss N = 36 Frontal hairline only 14 (38.9) Diffuse thinning only 6 (16.7) Back of scalp 1 (2.8) Sides of scalp only 1 (2.8) Frontal + diffuse thinning 5 (13.9) Frontal hairline + sides of scalp 4(11.1) Frontal hairline+ back of scalp + diffuse thinning 1 (2.8) Frontal hairline + sides of scalp + diffuse thinning 2 (5.6) Strategies used to prevent or treat alopecia Topical therapies 22 (21.2) Oral therapies 8 (7.7) Changing hijab or hair styling practices 31 (29.8) Comfortable seeking care from a medical provider 80 (76.9) Dermatologist 59 (56.7) Primary care provider 20 (19.2) Other/no response 1 (0.1) Barriers to seeking medical care for hair loss Lack of culturally competent care 15 (14.4) Lack of provider knowledge regarding hijab-related practices 13 (12.5) Lack of hijab-wearing medical providers 11 (10.5) This table presents the results of a survey study conducted among 104 hijab-wearing Muslim women in New York City. It provides a detailed breakdown of the participants’ daily hijab-wearing habits, hairstyles, and their perceptions and experiences of hair loss associated with hijab wear. The variables are presented alongside the number and percentage of participants who reported each response. For the variable “Location of hair loss,” the total number of respondents was 36, as this question was only applicable to those who reported experiencing hijab-associated hair loss. In terms of styling practices, over two-thirds of the participants wore the hijab for at least 7 hours daily (70.2%, n = 73/104). Approximately 85% (83.4%, n = 87/104) wore an undercap beneath their hijab. Interestingly, nearly two-thirds of the participants were aware of potential alopecia associated with the hijab (62.5%, n = 65/104). Over one-third reported experiencing hair loss that they attributed to the hijab (34.6%, n = 36/104) and of those, 26 (72.2%) identified the frontal hairline as the location of the hair loss, either exclusively or in combination with other scalp areas. Significantly, 71.2% of women (n = 74/104) reported that hair is integral to their self-identity. Most women expressed willingness to seek medical care for hair loss (76.9%, n = 80/104). However, 29.8% (n = 30/104) identified barriers to seeking medical care, most frequently a perceived lack of cultural competency and knowledge of hijab-related practices among healthcare providers. Our study reveals that a significant number of Muslim women experience alopecia they believe is associated with hijab wear. We found that hair is a crucial aspect of Muslim women’s identities, yet over one-third of the surveyed women were unaware of hijab-associated alopecia. This underscores the vital role of healthcare providers in educating women about religious headwear-associated traction alopecia and its mitigation to prevent potentially irreversible effects. Healthcare providers should proactively offer strategies for traction alopecia mitigation to their hijab-wearing patients such as adopting looser hairstyles, altering hijab fabrics (jersey or cotton is less likely to slip), or the use of undercaps with ties to allow for size adjustment. If hair under hijab is styled in a knot or ponytail, varying the location in which it is styled is recommended. Medical therapies can be considered when alopecia is present. Such recommendations can help prevent and treat hair loss without compromising a patient’s religious practices or beliefs. Study limitations include a small sample size, self-reported alopecia, and the absence of a comparison to a group of non-hijab-wearing women. Additionally, the data was exclusively collected from women in mosques, potentially biasing the results as these women may be more religious and discussions on hijab-associated alopecia may be a particularly sensitive topic. Finally, this study on a United States-based population may not be generalizable to the global population. Factors such as differences in hair type, pin placement, and hair-cutting practices may influence results. Despite these limitations, this data provides valuable insights into Muslim women’s perceptions of hair loss, enabling healthcare providers to address their needs more effectively. Controlled prospective studies to objectively evaluate this population are necessary. Conflicts of interest J.S. is a consultant for Aclaris Therapeutics, Incyte, and Replicel Life Sciences. J.S. and K.L.S. have been investigators for Regen Lab and are investigators for Pfizer. K.L.S. is a consultant for Pfizer and Aquis. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Funding None. Study approval This study was approved by the IRB at New York University Grossman School of Medicine (s23-00087). Author contributions LA: Participated in research design, performance of the research, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. FB: Participated in research design, performance of the research, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. MGB: Participated in research design, performance of the research, and writing of the manuscript. JS: Participated in research design, performance of the research, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. KLS: Participated in research design, performance of the research, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. Data availability Data is incorporated into the article. Additional data is available on request.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,043
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,450

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,085
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal of Women’s DermatologyMême sujetHair Growth and DisordersTravaux en français237 207