MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388729794 · doi:10.1111/eva.13609

For the love of fish, nature and people: A tribute to Professor Louis Bernatchez (1960–2023)

2023· article· en· W4388729794 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Maren Wellenreuther, Anne‐Laure Ferchaud, Luciano B. Beheregaray, Alberto Soares Corrêa, Kathryn R. Elmer, Dylan J. Fraser, Danna R. Gifford, Zachariah Gompert, Marc T. J. Johnson, Rees Kassen, Ryan A. Martin, Mariah H. Meek, Joachim Mergeay, Claire Mérot, Kerry A. Naish, Shawn R. Narum, Paul Sunnucks, Frédéric Thomas, Peter H. Thrall, José M. Yáñez, Jiasui Zhan, Xiangjiang Zhan

Notice bibliographique

RevueEvolutionary Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueFish Ecology and Management Studies
Établissements canadiensWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of OttawaCanada Research ChairsParks CanadaUniversity of TorontoConcordia University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPassionTributeGenerosityEnvironmental ethicsHonorLuckManagementSociologyHistoryPolitical scienceArt historyLawPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It is difficult to overstate the profound impact that Professor Louis Bernatchez had on the wider field of genomics applied to the conservation and management of aquatic resources. Louis died on 28 September 2023 at the age of 63. His passing represents an immense loss. He has held the position of Editor-in-Chief for Evolutionary Applications since its inception in 2008, and his unwavering passion and commitment to making science relevant for a wide range of applications and end-users have significantly influenced the journal's trajectory. We remember him as an exceptionally compassionate, encouraging and genuine individual, possessing unparalleled scientific expertise, and boundless generosity (Figure 1). Our hearts go out to his family, friends, colleagues and students during this incredibly challenging period. Born in 1960, Louis grew up in the small and tight-knit community of Lac-Frontière in Québec, Canada (Ferchaud et al., 2020). His formative years were spent in the wilderness, engaging in hunting and fishing, which helped to forge a profound and enduring bond with the natural world—a connection that would remain with him throughout his life. At the age of 12, he already harboured a firm resolve to pursue a career as a biologist. In 1983, he earned his BSc from the Université Laval in Québec, Canada. Shortly after in 1986, he completed his MSc degree, researching the energetic costs in Lake Whitefish and Cisco. This research ignited a lifelong passion, leading to 40 years dedicated to exploring microevolution's role in macroevolution using sympatric Lake Whitefish species pairs. Afterwards, he briefly left academia to launch a commercial whitefish harvesting project in the remote Quebec community, Laniel. He returned to academia and earned his PhD in 1990, initially focused on the population genetic structure of coregonine fishes which he expanded into a thesis on large-scale phylogeography. Following his PhD, he held postdoctoral positions in France (Université de Montpellier II) and Canada (University of Guelph, Ontario) but felt a strong pull to return to Québec. In 1992, he became a Research Associate at the Université du Québec and later an Assistant Professor at the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS). Finally, in 1995, he re-joined the Université Laval, where he rose to full professorship in 2004, took the head of the Institute of Integrative Biology and Systems in 2018, and continued his academic journey until his passing. Louis had a prolific and productive career spanning four decades. He has supported and co-authored well over 500 publications and worked with over 100 collaborators (Figure 2). As anyone who worked with Louis knows, most of these collaborators probably enjoyed (at least) a meal or drink with him, over which he passionately discussed politics, science and fishes. This attitude was just a reflection of his restless working style. For him, being a scientist was his way of living, and he combined this with all the other pleasures he had in life, spanning food, politics, wine, time with loved ones and music. Family played a pivotal role in every facet of Louis's life, and his seamless integration of family and his scientific pursuits served as a powerful example of how one could genuinely embrace and celebrate the concept of work–life balance. As part of his tireless passion for science, he contributed immensely to the growth of new disciplines in the field. He was a pioneer in phylogeography and in the application of functional genomics to non-model organisms. He stressed the importance of integrating molecular genetics and ecology in understanding adaptive divergence and speciation, and he also championed population genomics, advocating for the holistic integration of genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic data with ecological, physiological and life-history data in adaptation studies. He also demonstrated the importance of conservationists engaging with researchers in other disciplines, such as climate science, economics and social science. While he primarily focused on fishes, he expanded his research to include a diverse range of organisms, from invertebrates and birds to mammals. His name is now synonymous with the concepts of ecotype divergence, conservation genomics, genetic health, natural resources management and evolutionary adaptive potential, and his achievements have left a permanent mark on these areas of study. Louis was highly active in fish research with Indigenous communities across Canada and had a particular soft spot for Eeyou Istchee where he conducted some of his earliest research on whitefish along the James Bay coast. Most recently, he became the Principal Scientist leading the Genome Canada grant Fostering Indigenous Small-scale fisheries for Health, Economy and Food Security (FISHES, https://fishes-project.ibis.ulaval.ca/about-fishes/). This FISHES project is a multi-year project weaving genomics, fisheries science and indigenous knowledge across northern Canada to address critical socio-economic challenges and opportunities related to food security and commercial, recreational and subsistence fisheries, and Louis was passionate about it. Louis has received numerous awards, and scientific accolades for his contributions to the scientific advancements of these fields (Ferchaud et al., 2020). Most notable are the Canadian Research Chair in Conservation Genetics of Aquatic Resources and then in Genomics and Conservation of Aquatic Resources, which he held since 2001 and 2006, respectively, and election to the Royal Society of Canada (2011), American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011), receiving the Marie-Victorin Prix du Québec (2012), the Molecular Ecology Prize (2016) and being elected to become knight of the Ordre National du Québec (2020). Beyond the formal prizes and awards, Louis was humbly delighted that such recognition gave him the opportunity to share science, to communicate broadly about the research of his team and to diffuse important messages for the conservation of biodiversity. The scientific community will remember him not only for these awards but also for his passion for science, energetic personality and collaborative philosophy, which he incorporated into a unique way of doing research. Those who had the honour and pleasure of knowing him knew that Louis was not only a living scientific hub but also a colleague, teacher, supervisor and mentor who influenced the lives of so many of us in profound ways. He was immensely passionate about raising the next generation of scientists from undergraduate to post-doctoral researchers. His team, his ‘gang’ as he would have said in québecois, was his highest priority throughout his career including during the last months fighting for his life. This supervising role was his biggest pride, not merely from a scientific point of view, but also as a mentor, who took great care of the future and happiness of his students who were about to take the next step in their careers. Such attention to others was expansive in time—membership of the Bernatchez group had no expiration date—and also in space: Louis had many enduring relationships with collaborators around the world. Despite the untimely departure of Louis, he would have wanted us to continue treading the path he so brilliantly charted. He would have enjoyed seeing us coming together not just as colleagues but as friends, sharing a glass of wine or a beer, listening to harmonious melodies and revelling in joyful laughter. As we navigate the journey he began, we pay tribute to his enduring spirit and the indelible mark he left upon our lives. In Box 1, we offer some reflections on Louis' extraordinary journey as Editor-in-Chief of Evolutionary Applications, and past and present Associate Editors and Guest Editors of the journal share some of their personal thoughts and memories about Louis as leader, storyteller, colleague and mentor. Over the course of his period as Editor-in-Chief of Evolutionary Applications, Louis has managed a substantial portfolio, encompassing more than 6000 manuscripts. It was late September 2000. I had arrived in Brisbane the night before and was as excited as I was frightened about presenting my ongoing PhD work in front of Louis Bernatchez, the world-famous fish phylogeographer. I was there because of an invitation from Craig Moritz: ‘You should come and visit our lab. Louis is doing a sabbatical with us'. I will be always thankful for that invite. Louis' kindness and humour made me feel immediately at ease. My talk Biogeography and speciation of South American silverside fishes was followed by Louis' brilliant talk Fish stories from the North: relevance for speciation. Too many fishes in just 1 day for a herpetology lab! Louis' assertiveness assured me I was on the right track and his huge interest in fish evolution later sparked our long-term research collaboration across the equator. He acted as my PhD examiner, and years later became the host for my first academic sabbatical, a mentor, a key team member of our rainbowfish projects and field expeditions, a host for my PhD students and postdocs, an inspiring and tireless Editor-in-Chief, and an amusing friend. We had the chance to celebrate work and life multiple times, and what always amazed me in those moments was how generous with his time and kind Louis was with students and colleagues (including competitors), as well as with random folks who crossed his path. In this article, we pay tribute to his life, to his immense integrative vision and to his prominent contributions to the fields of ecological, evolutionary and conservation genomics. For me, I will always remember and celebrate Louis as the friendliest and greatest ‘fish guy’ I've ever met. I have only met Louis in person three short times, three memorable times though. I have never collaborated with him on a project or an article, and yet today I feel a great emptiness, as great as the loss of a close colleague, or even a member of my family. Louis was like that. He made us feel part of a big family, the molecular ecology family, of which he was a figurehead. And even more so, for the community of aquatic geneticists, that he loved, protected, encouraged and pushed to be the best it could be. For example, he pushed me hard to write one of my rare articles that had little impact in our field, the coupling hypothesis, arguing that discussions over beers at conferences were pointless and that you had to have the courage to act on your convictions. I wish he was around to us that up the of Evolutionary Applications, or other he worked to new or I also with him the which he as a He was to a with and many of my and PhD Louis' for their PhD or the students in my team also wanted to to Louis' which was as for the of its science as it was for the that We also it to him that the Bernatchez of and working has throughout he me to be an Associate of Evolutionary Applications he had in me, and this in gave me in For he me in of and he pushed me to for new in the field and supported and me with his We were to work the of the best Editor-in-Chief one could I will him so I was an invitation by Louis to as an Associate I never had the chance to him in It me to of his and I would like to my to his family and my time to Evolutionary Applications, I have a interest the team in the application of evolutionary in the field of I that this is a that other in this not share the the I received from Louis me, it that he was immensely passionate about the and to the importance of understanding the evolutionary in the where the and are not by Louis was such a and it was to with I him always and also a to the right to He to and remember He could always a of time to around an offer some or return a with He was so for our community and we will feel the loss. Louis' and passion for applied have him at the as a as well as a of his to to fields or even he has a diverse of in the journal fisheries genomics, and evolution of evolutionary adaptation and He of research and research over the years and probably more his publications and Louis so many he We will not be for his contributions to the field, and boundless generosity and He will be I to have Louis for over years as his PhD as a close research and as an Associate of Evolutionary Applications some time Louis a unique of a pioneer and over many but also a and Louis was a spirit who supported those he and who a of opportunities to He many career researchers as well as and had an to out the best in research and no their Louis you to a project or you knew you were in for an that would be challenging and a of hard but also a highly with some and food in the Louis was encouraging me to his as a he left a on my the project working with and in northern Canada. His with have a of and he was I have for a academic in research life, and I for Louis and in me over the there is a to be made for the Evolutionary to the of an individual, Louis is it. I first met Louis in my career at a during my studies. Evolutionary Applications had then as a and I remember his and for its Over a I was Louis me to the journal's our never crossed in person I for the and he during my first as an Associate Louis made a mark on the ecology and evolution research community in an enduring that will the future for years to Louis' contributions to the journal and field of I would like to his contributions from a personal I first met Louis after a talk I was a He me to and I was by the of he how I years he me to be an Associate for Evolutionary I was for the way he and encouraged me in my as an Associate My are from I the and encouraging way Louis with up and coming of scientists was his greatest In to role as an scientist and of the first journal in applied evolutionary in he helped to and a in Canada. with and Louis Our the advocating for for students and postdoctoral day 1, he helped to our with at a in in front of to the and and served on our of As as the before his he our and was and He was greatest fighting for students and postdoctoral out to me in of Louis' contributions to the The first was that he managed to it the and it to become an for in the field. many evolutionary would talk about the relevance of their research before Evolutionary Applications, there was no to it. The in evolutionary science to be more in the field. those in ecology and the importance of evolution in their work it like Evolutionary Applications an important in the research in doing so, and in many the of evolutionary for The was Louis as a was always generous to me, as I he was with with his Despite being to me in the Canadian academic he never held in in our always me with and as a colleague, our I as a scientist to my way in research. He made me feel I had a in the research of this For I He was a generous person and made contributions to evolutionary science. He will be I not Louis of the journal but I the yet he gave to the the to the applied research in evolution that In doing so, he helped Evolutionary Applications a great for research in my field of for which I will always be Louis has a of for me throughout my As a he had in my as one of the the field to which I was And then I to him I was a and his in my rose even It is not that you to one of your and are so and As many others have Louis' of career researchers made a mark on so many of Louis and his continued to the way as I on to my and I to with him I to to in my that every time I had what I was was the best all I had to was a and Louis was to be a on doing it than I could have We will that he for us and our best to honour him by to it Louis was a and inspiring academic and In he me to a for Evolutionary Applications to the of an I had I had just as a and Louis some This out to be a for In a he pleasure in his work and a passion for the of and I always felt in his We a for fishing, and I will continue to remember and honour his I in a a to the next Louis' to scientific from a strong that science should be he me to act as a to about the articles in Evolutionary Applications on social I was scientific in a as on commercial which not our and Louis' was and my about it. His was to share scientific the of and communicate to a of end-users and the This was relevant for with applications like the ones in Evolutionary Louis' in scientific was also by his contributions to and times, we about coming to Louis' to Louis took all opportunities to science to His and his for about science were in raising about the importance of research and the conservation of in Québec and at an I that Louis' commitment to science is an important part of his that will inspiring many of Louis was key to the field of Molecular he His was a and He particular attention to the of and I in with generosity and I remember I first met Louis, but I remember the to the Evolutionary Applications connection to many expansive discussions from the that by me on a Our crossed and and I was always with Louis' his to science, his to and the way that he science as a team I to have worked with has always a huge of Louis had an vision for science that would multiple fields for including ecological, and conservation genomics. He applications not only his but also by and encouraging Louis was at the of new genomics and his has in a new that to our understanding of the genetic of natural the loss of Louis, he this incredibly to the of us to in this world. I to have him and his Louis was a in molecular population leading and inspiring a of and science that contributed to the of the This is demonstrated by a at and a of Louis' and the field was also including more than as a of Molecular Ecology from close to the of that and being the Evolutionary Applications since its these achievements not the contributions that Louis made to in the field, his as an of those have by who knew Louis well (Ferchaud et al., 2020). Louis was also an role the lives of to him he probably not As a new Associate of Molecular Ecology in the I from and from Louis, before I met him in as an of in Molecular Ecology and Evolutionary Applications, I had such great with Louis's personality and as an that I have to his and into my my research group and I have Louis and Evolutionary Applications as an example of how scientific should be years I had the of Louis in Quebec our first I was immediately by his research and the with which he about it. Louis became a with I right to the His courage was even he that he had an His to that evolutionary was not just an way of the but that it had applications in many contributed to the of our we are to continue on Louis' that his lives I worked with Louis for many years on the journal Evolutionary Applications, from the in While I not that Louis and I ever met in we about related to the journal and the field. It was always a not just because of the of but also because Louis was always generous with his a and of his Louis was passionate about the of science by Evolutionary Applications, and his for evolutionary research and application held strong over the many years of his In Louis helped to to for journal to data and and that he felt was He was a scientist and colleague, and the field will be Louis me to Evolutionary Applications, and after one of our many discussions that science, and he that we a on to and applied evolutionary in At that I was active in the for in science at the of in and we had many discussions about the to the of in science and to these so that others and be It was the first time that I was the for a and he supported me throughout the and and It was after that he me to become an Associate for Evolutionary Applications and I have that For me, Louis has an inspiring role who was to the and applied research. Louis' will for years to come because he his into on and where it made a In my view, this represents the of scientific merely knowledge but science with the of our and with one and the Louis took immense in his he at the time He in me, the of that he that of his scientific work from the of he with unwavering in his to be as a person of and Louis has also played a pivotal role in the of the of Evolutionary Applications into genetics and genomics applied to His vision was for the of at the genetic of integrating data into genetic and the of and in a of a for research in these Louis has contributed significantly to the journal's of the evolutionary and our understanding of how genomics be for the of and aquatic organisms. Louis was a of Evolutionary Applications, and the of the He was not only an scientist and a dedicated but also an my role as Associate for the I Louis multiple times with about and He was always and to and my and In the before his he was about a for the I have Louis since I in the It was him who me to the He was always and His work has many of conservation and and Louis' passion for science, fish and the was Louis' scientific spirit lives on in the postdocs, research and research that he over the years and collaborators that he Louis many he We will him The would like to all that have Louis, or that have crossed with his This tribute is to celebrate the impact that he has left The have no of

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,815
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,526

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEvolutionary ApplicationsMême sujetFish Ecology and Management StudiesTravaux en français237 207