Honoring Dr. Bernard Dov Spolsky: February 11, 1932–August 20, 2022
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Honoring Dr. Bernard Dov SpolskyFebruary 11, 1932–August 20, 2022 Teresa L. McCarty [End Page 6] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. Bernard Spolsky with Dame Katerina Mataira, Māori language reclamation leader, 2008. (Photo courtesy of Springer Nature, License No. 5527970835886) Bernard dov spolsky, the eminent sociolinguist who led the first comprehensive sociolinguistic study of a Native American language and its implications for education, passed away in Jerusalem on August 20, 2022, surrounded by loving family members. He was 90 years old. Born and raised in Aotearoa/New Zealand to parents of Ukrainian and Russian Polish descent—a family he once described as "plain and humble members of the Wellington Jewish community" (Spolsky, 1994, p. 271)—Bernard Spolsky went on to become a secondary teacher and later, a professor in Canada, the United States, and Israel. A seminal scholar of language policy and educational linguistics, Professor Spolsky had a lifetime commitment to the revitalization and maintenance of Indigenous languages, particularly Māori and Diné, the Indigenous language communities with whom he worked most closely. His scholarly corpus is immense—more than 300 articles and book chapters and 40 books, many of which he wrote after his official "retirement." In this memoriam, based on JAIE coeditor Teresa McCarty's longtime relationship with Professor Spolsky but offered from all of us on the JAIE editorial team, we pay special tribute to Bernard Spolsky's pathbreaking work on the Navajo Reading Study, a landmark project in American Indian bilingual-bicultural-biliteracy education. I first met Professor Spolsky (Bernard) through his work and his words, long before I would ever have the privilege of meeting him in person. I was living and working at Rough Rock, Navajo Nation, Arizona, the site of the first contemporary American Indian community-controlled school. With the school board's and the local chapter's approval, I had embarked on an ethnographic study of the school's [End Page 7] bilingual-bicultural education program. One winter day, in the library of what was then Navajo Community College (now Diné College), I came across a treasure trove of reports from the Navajo Reading Study (NRS), which Bernard directed at the University of New Mexico from 1968 until his departure to Israel with his family in 1980. Working as we were then at Rough Rock, in a test-driven national political climate increasingly hostile to bilingual education, the NRS reports were a blast of fresh air. Here were bilingual education researchers saying something radically new: that instructional effects were likely the least consequential outcome of bilingual education for Navajo and Native American learners, and that those outcomes could not be understood separately from the social, economic, political, cultural, linguistic, religious, and psychological contexts in which bilingual education takes place (Read, Spolsky, & Neundorf, 1975; Spolsky, Green, & Read, 1974). I would like to share the rest of this story as much as possible in Bernard's words, as he and his colleagues wrote them in the dozens of NRS reports left to us, and in his many scholarly writings.1 It was 1968. Bernard had recently arrived at the University of New Mexico (UNM), with the institution's expectation that he would, in his words, "build a new linguistic program that would include … the teaching of English to Spanish speakers and Native Americans" (2010, p. 7). In the wake of the civil rights movement, the U.S. Bilingual Education Act had just been passed. But within the Navajo Nation, bilingual education was almost unheard of; the exceptions were a few schools with early bilingual programs, such as Rough Rock, Rock Point, Borrego Pass, and Ramah. English as a second language (ESL), Bernard wrote, was just being introduced as a "new subject" in some classrooms (2010, p. 2). Shortly after arriving at UNM, Bernard was invited to visit what he described as "a large Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) school" within the Navajo Nation. As he reflected four decades later: It was a three hour drive … the last hour through the … high desert … of … the Navajo Nation. In the midst of this varied and open land, … the school stood out as an alien settlement, surrounded by a wire...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».