Car Safety Seats and Restraints for Children in Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Injuries caused by road traffic are a significant public health concern. In the 0-12-year age group, among the leading causes of death, unintentional injuries are considered the second and main cause of morbidity due to the safety of children in cars. According to statistics, approximately 4.7% of deaths in Saudi Arabia are caused by road traffic, while fatalities from road traffic do not exceed 1.7% in Australia, the United Kingdom, or the United States. Road traffic injuries killed more people in Saudi Arabia than in any other country with a high income. Aim: In this study, parents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices were evaluated regarding child safety regarding child car seats in Al Ahsa community. Methods: A cross?sectional descriptive study was done from November 10 to December 31, 2022. The data were collected using a 19-question survey. A convenience sampling of 379 samples was conducted. Results: In one-quarter of the participants, (24.8%) had the wrong answer when we asked them whether it is safer to hold a newborn baby in their arms than placing them in baby car safety seats, while (5.8%) did not know what is safe. Regarding the knowledge about the right way to put the car safety seat for children aged 2-4 years, near to one quarter (23%) answered wrong answer, while (11.1%) did not know how to fix it in the car. In relation to fixing the car safety seat for children aged below 2 years, only half the participants (54.6%) knew the right way. The mean score of knowledge was 3.37/5 with Std dev. ±1.52.in relation to practices and attitudes, (11.9%) said that the child is afraid to sit in the back seats, while (68.3%) said they do. (92.9%) of respondents believe that child safety seats are important. (14%) reported not using the seatbelt for children while (18.7%) reported using it sometimes. (67.3%) of those surveyed reported using seatbelts for all their children under the age of eight. There were (66.6%) of participants with acceptable knowledge and attitude scores, while (31.4%) had low scores. Parents' education level and their knowledge level were found to be significantly correlated. Parents' knowledge about care safety increased with the number of children, but there was no significant correlation between knowledge level and gender or number of children. Conclusion: According to the study, car safety seat noncompliance includes multiple variables that can be modified. The study could raise awareness by focusing on a major public health issue and providing outreach on child safety in cars. Residents of Al Ahsa generally had a positive attitude and good knowledge of car safety seats.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle