Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AustraliaData Strategy PublishedThe Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) has published its Data Strategy 2023–2028 after an extensive public consultation that took place between 2022–2023.Ahpra consulted the public, practitioners, and various stakeholders, including employers and health system partners, on the strategy which sets the strategic directions for the collection, use, and disclosure of the data they hold and for future strategic data projects in the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (the National Scheme).The Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, as in force in each state and territory (the National Law), requires Ahpra to collect, use, and share data as part of their work to protect the public and facilitate access to a sustainable health workforce.The full report is available at https://www.ahpra.gov.au/About-Ahpra/Data-Strategy.aspxSource: Ahpra News Release, July 18, 2023CanadaMCC Blueprint Project 2023The Medical Council of Canada (MCC) has recently undertaken a review and revision process for the blueprints of its two large-scale examinations: the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination (MCCQE) Part I and the National Assessment Collaboration (NAC) Examination.The goals of the Blueprint Project are to:In the coming months, the Blueprint Project team will gather data from a diverse range of sources including national surveys, literature and document reviews, focus groups, and key informant interviews. This comprehensive data collection process will go beyond traditional medical expertise and examine the importance of emerging societal and technological competencies in medical practice. The insights gathered will be presented in late 2023 to a subject matter expert panel charged with making recommendations to the MCC on the nature of its revised blueprints.This comprehensive review and revision process demonstrates the MCC's commitment to maintaining the quality and relevance of its examinations, benefiting aspiring physicians, educational institutions, and the healthcare system as a whole.Source: Medical Council of Canada News Release, June 23, 2023United KingdomWorkplace Discrimination and the Effects on TraineesMicro-aggressions, negative comments, and stereotyping are just some of the workplace issues affecting trainee doctors, according to a report recently released by the General Medical Council (GMC).The regulator's annual national training survey was completed by more than 70000 doctors across the UK who are either in training or act as trainers. It included questions on discrimination for the first time this year, uncovering worrying insights into the experiences of trainees.The new questions posed to trainees covered topics such as unfair treatment, stereotyping, and confidence in reporting discriminatory or unprofessional behaviors. Answers relate to their experiences with colleagues or fellow healthcare professionals, rather than with patients or relatives.Though most doctors in training say they work in supportive environments, more than a quarter (27%) said they have experienced micro-aggressions, negative comments, or oppressive body language from colleagues. Poor behaviors are more prevalent in some specialties, with instances rising to a third for those working in obstetrics and gynecology, emergency medicine, and surgery.More than 1 in 10 trainee doctors reported they had felt ‘intentionally humiliated’ in front of others. The questions highlighted a particularly negative experience for those in their two-year long Foundation Program – doctors who have completed medical school and entered their first paid clinical work while training. One in 5 (22%) of foundation trainees said they'd been blamed for something they didn't do in their current post, compared to 1 out of 10 (10%) on specialty or core programs.More than a quarter (28%) of trainees said they had heard insults, stereotyping, or jokes relating to their or another person's protected characteristics in their post. This number rose to 38% for foundation trainees.The results highlighted that many feel uncomfortable speaking up. Only 6 out of 10 (60%) said they would feel confident about reporting discrimination without fear of adverse consequences.The full report is available at https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/national-training-survey-2023-initial-findings-report_pdf-101939815.pdfSource: GMC News Release, July 11, 2023
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle