History by committee: Representing the ‘facts’ of settler colonialism in a local historical society museum
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In his critical review of the National Gallery of Victoria's 2018 exhibition Colony, Bain Attwood (2019) suggests that the curators' aim of representing colonisation from both settler and Indigenous perspectives reflects the recent boom in exhibitions that seek to address what is termed 'difficult history' (see also Macdonald, 2008).Internationally, museums are displaying confronting histories and challenging nationalist erasures; for example, the International Slavery Museum in Liverpool and the Indian Residential School History and Dialogue Centre in Vancouver.In Australia, Indigenous artists such as Fiona Foley (2018) have pointed out that practices of historiographic critique and memorialisation have taken place in moveable Indigenous art, outside of national and academic institutions, in creative and community spaces (see also Foley & Howell, 2017;Grieves & Spiers, 2020;Konishi, 2019).Magdalena H Gross and Luke Terra (2018, p. 52) define 'difficult history' as 'periods that reverberate in the present and surface fundamental disagreements over who we are and what values we hold'.They note that some schoolteachers are reluctant to teach these periods of history, which include civil wars and colonisation, because they are too 'controversial' and 'divisive'.'What makes difficult history difficult', they explain, 'is … the degree to which it challenges or undermines the 10.HISTORY BY COMMITTEE Prowse, 2015).While there has been change in these spaces, and we must be careful not to dismiss the unique and sometimes also collaborative or consultative initiatives in place, commonly these museums retain aspects of a 'pioneer mythology' of settlement, with a focus on industry and early settler families.As Cameo Dalley has written elsewhere, these kinds of discussions about 'history by committee' also raise key questions around the reflexive and educational 'pre-decolonial' groundwork that settler individuals and groups can engage in before usefully contributing to decolonial activities, specifically in the realm of narrating local histories (Dalley, 2021; see also Land, 2015). Local history in focusAttention to local history spaces is of renewed importance following the 2018 delivery of the Final Report of the Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition Relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.The recommendations for truth-telling within the report state that it is 'best implemented at local and regional levels' (Section 6.54).Legal scholars Gabrielle Appleby and Megan Davis (2018) noted in their submission that 'truth-telling must come from local communities, led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples working with non-Aboriginal people in that community'.'Local history societies' are one of the partners they list (Section 6.56).If such societies are to play a role, it is important to understand more about their current remit, how they are run, and their interest in, and capacity to educate visitors about, histories that may be seen as sensitive, confronting or divisive.This is of particular importance given that, in most Australian towns, local museums are often central venues for learning about history for locals and tourists, making them pivotal in the transmission of information and education.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,016 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».