Analysis of risk factors for community-acquired Clostridioides difficile diarrhea in children: a case-control study in Chenzhou, China
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Most previous studies on Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) mainly focused on adults with underlying diseases or critical illnesses. However, the number of CDI cases in children has also significantly increased, especially the growth of community-acquired CDI, which has attracted attention. This study was conducted to examine the toxin gene characteristics and the risk factors associated with community-acquired CDI (CA-CDI) in children with diarrhea. Methods: Children with diarrhea before admission or within 48 hours of hospitalization were included in the study. Stool samples were collected from children with community-acquired diarrhea who were treated at the Children’s Hospital of the First People’s Hospital of Chenzhou, China from June of 2021 to June of 2022. Fluorescence real-time polymerase chain reaction was utilized to detect Clostridioides difficile (CD) toxins A (tcdA) and B (tcdB) genes as well as binary toxin gene A (cdtA) and B (cdtB) in the specimens cultured for CD. Each child with CA-CDI was matched with four control children of the same sex, age, and place of residence. Necessary clinical data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic medical record system. Then, a multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis was applied to identify potential risk factors for CA-CDI. Results: Sixteen (8.3%) of the 193 stool specimens who tested positive for CD were selected for the case group, and their matching 64 control patients were in the study cohort. The breakdown of the CD genotypes of the 16 positive cases were follows: 14 (tcdA+ and tcdB+) (7.25%) and 2 (tcdA+ and tcdB−) (1.04%). The cdtA and cdtB binary toxin genes were negative in all. The results of multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis identified antibiotic use within the previous month [odds ratio (OR) =5.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65–15.91] and non-breastfeeding (OR =4.89; 95% CI: 1.11–21.53) as independent risk factors for CDI in pediatric patients experiencing community-acquired diarrhea. Conclusions: Children who had been treated with antibiotics and not breastfed were more susceptible to CDI. Therefore, in order to prevent and to control the spread of CD infection, being prudent to the aforementioned high-risk factors is strongly advocated in clinical practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».