Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Service Canada's (CSC) human rights abuses under the Harper government's punishment agenda.The way I discerned this punishment agenda developing was similar to how other countries in the past would centre out a powerless and branded segment of society to oppress.They incite vicious hatred against the group and categorize them into one group of 'enemies'.This method conveniently separates them from the rest of normal society.Once the Harper Conservatives were able to instill this into the public whenever some tragedy occurred in the communities, it would beat the justice and public safety drum loud.Often leading the correctional oppression against the criminalized was Mr. Vic Toews, who was Justice Minister from February 2006 to January 2007 and the Public Safety Minister from January 2010 to July 2013.He seemed to dislike all the federal prisoners whom he labelled as 'off enders', contributing to the division between the Canadian people and the incarcerated.He especially seemed to dislike the prisoners serving life terms for murder, which are sentences that can leave one behind bars indefi nitely.He stated, along with many other Conservatives, that Canadian people convicted for murder should never be out in the community on parole, which sent the message to all community parole services across Canada to revoke and return to prison as many Lifers they could get away with under the guise of public safety.Not satisfi ed with the re-incarceration of many of these prisoners, the retribution continued.He dismantled Life Line, the only program CSC had for prisoners sentenced to life under some form of state supervision.His offi ce then created policies to make it more diffi cult for Lifers to attain any form of release.First, the policy of requiring Lifers to go before the Parole Board Canada (PBC) panels for Escorted Temporary Absences (ETAs) contributes to the unnecessary delays and is used as a punishment stick.This practice also stripped the power of penitentiary wardens to approved ETAs to eligible prisoners who earned it.Re-incarcerating all those paroled Lifers also clogs up the rehabilitation and release process for the ones still working for freedom.It is bizarre to require a Lifer to repeat the ETA process when they have been in the community for extended periods of time.This glaring punishment policy needs to be removed, with wardens again having the power to approve medical, compassionate and re-socialization ETAs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».