MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388989744 · doi:10.22067/econg.2022.72028.1035

Petrography, Geochemistry and Tectonics of Harris Granite, East Azerbaijan Province: Evidence for Intracontinental Rift Magmatism

2022· article· en· W4388989744 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Farhad Pirmohammadi Alishah, Mehdi Mohammadrezaei, Ahmad Jahangiri

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyPetrographyMagmatismRiftGeochemistryTectonicsPetrologyPaleontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Granites are interesting because of their abundance in the continental crust and the presentation of valuable information from the depths of the earth and their close dependence on tectonic and geodynamic processes (Bonin, 2007). The Mishu granites are exposed over an area around 50 km2 in the northwestern Iran near the city of Tabriz (Figures 1 and Figures 2). The Mishu granites have been injected into the Neoproterozoic shales, carbonates, sandstones, and tuffs of the Kahar Formation (Asadian et al. 1994). Mafic and ultramafic rocks (gabbro, basalt, and dunite) occur at the north and northeast of the Mishu granites and seem to be the host of granites. Field observations show a magmatic injection of the Mishu granites into the mafic-ultramafic rocks. There are several outcrops of granite rocks in the northwest Iran, including Takab–Zanjan, Khoy, Soursat, and Mishu. Among these outcrops, there are no systematic geochemical and geochronological studies on the Mishu rocks. In this paper, we investigate the genetic relationship between different parts of the mass, origin of the constructive magma and the tectonic position of this intrusion with the help of the results of field studies governing different parts of the Harris intrusion mass, petrography and geochemical analysis of the main and rare elements. Material and methods A total of 150 samples were collected from Mishu granites. Polished thin sections were prepared from all the collected samples. Based on petrographic observations, 20 samples with minimal effects of hydrothermal alteration were selected for whole-rock geochemical analysis (Table 1). These selected samples were analyzed for major and trace elements at the ACME Laboratory (in the ACME Analytical Laboratories of Vancouver, Canada). Analytical errors for major elements are assessed as <1% of the determined concentrations. Results are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Major element oxide analysis was performed by Lithium Borate Fusion and Inductively Paired Plasma Emission Spectrometer (ICP-ES). In this method, the number of oxides of the main elements is measured based on weight percentage. The measurement accuracy for the main elements in this method was 0.01 Wt.%. Also, in this method, the number of volatiles in the form of L.O.I. was measured with an accuracy of 0.01%. The induced coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) method was used to measure the amount of trace and rare elements. The detection threshold of these elements, depending on the element, varied from close to 0.01 ppm to 10 ppm. Results Harris granite rocks are in the northwestern Iran and about 20 km west of Shabestar city. This mass is composed of alkaline feldspar granite. The most abundant texture seen in these rocks is micro-pertite and myrmicite and based on lithographic and geochemical properties, they belong to A2-type granites. The samples are meta-aluminous to per-aluminous is based on the saturation index of alumina. In general, the studied granites have higher amounts of Na2O + K2O, Fe / Mg, Ga / Al, HFSEs and lower amounts of CaO, Sr and Eu. Also, the content of REEs of the samples in the normalized graph concerning chondrite shows a negative Eu anomaly. In other words, it is likely that A-type alkaline granites after collision have been created in this area following collision events and during their placement the tensile structure is predominant. Normalized multi-element diagrams as well as high Rb indicate that the continental crust has played a significant role in the formation of the Harris granite producing magma, possibly due to the melting of the lower crust by a tonalitic-granodioritic combination. Discussion All lithographic and geochemical data show that Harris granite rocks are of A-type nature. Negative anomalies of Ba, Nb, Ti, Sr and Eu and enrichment in LILEs, especially Rb and Th, indicate the crustal origin of these rocks separation of feldspar during crystallization or the presence of feldspar as a residual phase in the origin and the anomaly of P and Ti to iron-titanium and apatite oxides. Enrichment in LILE and HFSE elements with negative anomalies of Nb and Ti is a characteristic of subduction-dependent. The negative anomaly of Eu in the trace element pattern can be attributed to granites, usually attributed to the mantle origin, previously due to the metamorphic activity of fluids from sediments deposited by LILE and HFSE elements (Pearce et al., 1984), or may be the nature of magmas rooted from a subcontinent meteorite mantle formed during early subduction. In addition, enrichment at Th, Rb, and depletion at Sr, Eu, Ba, Nb, and Ti indicate that the granites are rooted in crustal lavas (Zhao and Zhou., 2007).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,060
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,119

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,143
Tête enseignante GPT0,446
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Même sujetGeological and Geochemical Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→