Immuno‐modulating and anti‐viral properties of Tulathromycin in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a positive‐strand RNA virus that grows in primary alveolar macrophages and causes acute pneumonia in pigs. PRRSV is a major concern in the swine industry with a total cost of productivity losses estimated at $600 million annually in the U.S.A alone. However, due to its high antigenic variability, and poorly understood immunopathogenesis, there is currently no treatment to control PRRSV infection. The common occurrence of PRRSV infection with bacterial infections, including Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae , begs the question of the value of antibiotics for the treatment of the disease it causes. Tulathromycin, a macrolide used for the treatment and prevention of respiratory disease in pigs and cattle, has been shown to exhibit potent immuno‐modulating properties [1]. We hypothesize that these may in turn attenuate the detrimental effects of PRRSV in porcine macrophages. Such findings will help characterize novel mechanism through which an anti‐microbial agent may deliver clinical benefits in the context of a viral infection. Aims 1) to determine if Tulathromycin has direct anti‐viral effects in PRRSV‐infected porcine macrophages. 2) to identify new immuno‐modulating effects of Tulathromycin in macrophages infected with PRRSV. Methods Porcine monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood drawn from the jugular vein of healthy piglets. Seven day‐old monocyte‐derived macrophages were treated with Tulathromycin (at a physiological concentration of 1 mg/ml [1]) or untreated (vehicle control) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Macrophages were then cultured in media alone, or with PRRSV (multiplicity of infection, MOI 100:1) for 1 h. (1) Viral titers in supernatants, or intracellular titers inside macrophages, were measured at 1 h, 2 h, 24 h and 48 h post infection. Serial dilutions of 48h supernatants were performed (ranging from 10 −2 to 10 −7 pfu) and added to MARC‐145 cells at 100% confluence. (2) Macrophage activation was assessed by phenotypic observations under microscopy. (3) Macrophage phagocytic activity was measured using zymosan particles (1 μg/mL) for 24 hours. (4) Effects of Tulathromycin on viral induced necrosis was analyzed using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay. Results (1) Tulathromycin did not change PRRSV particle forming unit (pfu) in macrophages at any time of infection ( 2.1×10 4 PFU/mL with tulathromycin versus 1.9×10 4 PFU/mL for control) (2). Exposure to PRRSV increases macrophage differentiation by more than four times compared to control. Pre‐treatment with tulathromycin significantly attenuated PRRSV‐induced macrophage activation (i.e. 1.85 times compared to untreated macrophages). (3) Macrophage phagocytic activity for zymosan was 25% lower in PRRSV‐infected macrophages versus uninfected control. Tulathromycin restored phagocytic impairment in PRRSV‐infected macrophages. (4) Tulathromycin reduced viral induced necrosis. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that Tulathromycin attenuates macrophage differentiation induced by PRRSV, restores PRRSV‐induced phagocytic impairment, and inhibits cell necrosis activated by the virus. These effects occur in the absence of a direct anti‐viral activity. Future research will assess whether and how these effects may alter the local production of pro‐inflammatory mediators in the lung, potentially conferring clinical benefits to Tulathromycin in the context of PRRSV‐induced pneumonia. Support or Funding Information Acknowledgements: Margaret Gunn endowment for Animal Health Research (U. of Calgary)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».