Grape Pomace and Resveratrol Do Not Restore Glucose Tolerance in the Ovariectomized Rat
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective The loss of estrogen in females is associated with a worsening of insulin sensitivity. Natural compounds such as resveratrol (RESV) have potential insulin sensitizing effects. Grape pomace (GP) is a byproduct of winemaking, and contains RESV and other antioxidants. To our knowledge, the efficacy of RESV and GP in restoring glucose tolerance in ovariectomized (OVX) rats has not been explored. Methods Phyto‐estrogen free diet was administered ad libitum to sham control (SHAM, n=10) and OVX (n=40) female Sprague‐Dawley rats for 12 wks until the onset of glucose intolerance in OVX rats. Glucose tolerance was assessed with an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT; 0.5g glucose/kg body mass) over a 2 hr period. Following the induction of glucose intolerance, OVX animals were divided into treatment and control groups (n=10 each). The first treatment group received a daily physiological dose of estrogen (E2, 28μg/kg body mass) orally via a Nutella cream (5μL sesame oil/1g Nutella/kg body mass). Another group of rats received a daily dose of RESV (5mg/kg body mass) mixed into the Nutella cream. Finally, the last treatment group had GP supplemented at 1.5% of their diet which provides about 5mg/kg body mass of RESV per day. SHAM, OVX CON, and OVX GP each received a daily dose of untreated Nutella. Animals were allowed ad libitum access to food, and treatment continued for 6 wks. At the end of the treatment period, IPGTTs were performed as well as an intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPTT). 2–3 d after the TTs, terminal surgeries were performed during which muscle red (RG) and white gastrocnemius (WG) muscles and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue was harvested before and 10 min after insulin injection (1 μg/kg body mass). Liver was sampled post insulin injection. All tissues were stored at −80°C. Tissues were analyzed for insulin signaling (phospho‐AktSer473). Visceral adipose was preserved and stained for analysis of adipocyte size. Results OVX animals were significantly heavier than control animals at the onset of glucose intolerance and this did not change throughout the treatment period. OVX animals consumed significantly more food during the first 6 wks following ovariectomy. OVX rats were glucose intolerant compared to SHAM controls after 12 wks (area under the curve (AUC): SHAM=316 vs OVX=CON 506 mM × min, p=0.0002,); none of the treatments restored normal glucose tolerance during the subsequent 6 wks (AUC OVX CON=452, E2=493, RESV=404, GP=453 vs SHAM=223 mM × min, p=.0121). Insulin tolerance was not worsened in OVX rats, and was unaffected with treatment. No difference in liver pAkt content was found between SHAM and OVX animals (p=0.3599). A significant increase was detected in pAkt in insulin simulated RG muscle compared to basal (p<0.0001); however there was no effect of ovariectomy (p=0.3680), and the interaction was not significant (p=0.3660). Similarly, pAkt content was increased in insulin stimulated WG muscle (p<0.0001), but there was no effect of ovariectomy (p=0.7822) or interaction (p=0.8037). Adipocyte size was significantly increased in the E2 (p=0.0552) and RESV (p=0.0121) groups compared to SHAM. Conclusion RESV and GP were not effective in restoring normal glucose tolerance in OVX rats. Support or Funding Information Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural AffairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».