Variation in sexual dimorphism of mouse os coxae shape, volume, and bone mineral density in response to selection for high voluntary wheel running
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pelvic (os coxae and sacrum) dimorphism is common in mammals. Studies (primarily on human and non‐human primates) of pelvic dimorphism suggest that dimorphism results from an evolutionary trade‐off between reproduction and locomotion. Previous work has shown that pelvic morphology varies in relation to locomotor modes among species and that, along with other girdle elements such as the scapula, high levels of voluntary activity cause training responses in mice. We analyzed three lines of laboratory mice, from an ongoing selection experiment, two of which have been bred for 59 generations for high levels of voluntary wheel running (HR) and one that is a non‐selected control (C) line. One selected line (HR MINI ) is fixed for a “mighty mini‐muscle” mutation that reduces skeletal muscle mass by up to 50%. The other selected line (HR NORMAL ) does not possess this mutation. We used two dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to produce quantitative descriptors of os coxae shape (Relative Warp scores) and geometric (centroid) size. In addition, we used X‐ray micro computed tomography (μCT) to measure elements of bone microstructure (bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume (BV)). ANOVAs showed significant differences in body size (length and mass) among the lines and between the sexes. Both HR lines were smaller than the C line, and the HR MINI line was smaller than the HR NORMAL line. However, although females were smaller than males in all three lines, os coxae centroid size was greater in females. Finally, for all size metrics, no significant sex‐by‐line interaction was present, indicating no differential sexual dimorphism among lines. Analyses of μCT data, with body size as a covariate, showed significant differences in BMD and BV of the os coxae among lines and between sexes. Females had higher BMD and BV than males, and HR lines had lower values than the C line (the HR MINI line showed the largest decrease). Additionally, a significant sex‐by‐line interaction in the analysis of BMD suggests a stronger effect of selection on males than on females. Finally, MANCOVAs, with body size as a covariate, revealed significant shape differences among lines and between sexes. A significant sex‐by‐line interaction was also found, indicating different patterns of shape difference between males and females, depending on line. These results indicate that although there is no effect of selective breeding or the mini‐muscle mutation on patterns of sexual dimorphism in body and os coxae size, this is not the case for patterns of sexual dimorphism in other components of coxal morphology. Male and female differences in os coxae shape and bone microstructure have different trajectories and magnitudes depending on line, suggesting that in some cases, males and females respond to selection and the mini‐muscle mutation in different ways. Support or Funding Information MJ Murdock Charitable Trust to HS, KB & CH U.C. Riverside Chancellor's Postdoctoral Fellowship to HS NSF IOS‐1121273 to TG
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle