No time for family meals – what's a family to do?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose Much research has touted the health benefits of family meals for adolescents, particularly for healthier diets. However, some families experience barriers (e.g., busy schedules, lack of cooking skills) that make it difficult to have regular family meals. Parents may need guidance about other ways that they might promote healthy eating in their adolescent children. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the home and family environment at different levels of family meal participation to see what factors are associated with adolescent fruit and vegetable (FV) intake. Results will inform recommendations regarding how other factors in the home environment may promote similar health benefits as having family meals Methods Data were drawn from EAT 2010 (Eating and Activity in Teens), a diverse population‐based study of 2,793 adolescents attending 20 public middle/high schools in Minneapolis/St‐Paul during 2009–2010. Adolescents completed an FFQ and survey items about home environmental factors hypothesized to be related to FV intake (FV availability, FV accessibility, parent encouragement, family communication, and family functioning). Linear regression models were used to examine: 1) individual associations between family meals, home factors and FV intake; 2) the relative influence of family meals and each home factor on FV intake; and 3) interactions between family meal frequency and the presence of other healthful home factors. Models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity and energy intake. Results In unadjusted models, all home factors were positively associated with FV intake. In mutually adjusted models, family meals, FV availability, FV accessibility, and parent encouragement for healthy foods were independently associated with higher FV intake. Among the 949 (35%) adolescents who reported infrequent family meals (≤2 days/week), greater home FV availability, FV accessibility, and parent encouragement were each associated with an approximately half serving increase in FV per day. Adolescents having regular family meals in addition to more favorable home characteristics had up to an additional one serving increase in FV per day. Conclusion Regular family meals in combination with other home environmental factors were associated with the best outcomes; however, instructing families to provide healthy foods and encouragement may lead to meaningful nutritional benefits in the absence of family meals. Support or Funding Information This study was supported by Grant Number R01HL084064 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (PI: Dianne Neumark‐Sztainer). AWW was supported by a fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».