1662. Perspectives of Caregivers of Children with Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Despite the fact that paediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is usually caused by viruses, antibiotics are often prescribed. The objective of this study was to understand caregiver perspectives and experiences relating to the treatment of paediatric CAP. Methods This was a phenomenologically-informed qualitative study involving interviews with caregivers of young children in Hamilton, Ontario. Caregivers were interviewed with open-ended questions relating to germ theory, the nature of pneumonia, and the role of antibiotic treatment. The principles of conventional content analysis were used to guide the coding and synthesis of the transcribed interviews. Results Eleven caregivers were interviewed. Most had a good understanding of the difference between bacteria and viruses and many knew that antibiotics were not effective against all types of infections. Many also stated that there was an increased risk of developing resistance with frequent antibiotic use. However, there were misconceptions that probiotics effectively mitigated antibiotic side effects and few were familiar with the potential long-term impacts of antibiotic use in children. There was variability in the perceived severity of paediatric CAP. For children sick enough to require treatment in the emergency department (ED), some participants thought that antibiotic treatment would be important to prescribe to accelerate recovery, as well as to prevent caregivers from feeling helpless. However, participants also thought it was inappropriate for physicians to prescribe antibiotics solely to make the caregiver feel better. Many caregivers also felt strongly that clinical follow-up and discussions on treatment risks and benefits would be desirable and might counteract feelings of helplessness that might result from being sent home without a prescription. Conclusion Recognizing that parents may have misperceptions about antibiotic use for CAP (and may seek antibiotics without strong rationale) can inform clinicians’ efforts to better educate and support caregivers in the ED. Care strategies informed by caregiver experiences can improve parent-provider communication, increase trust in the attending clinician, and reduce antibiotic misuse. Disclosures Jeffrey Pernica, MD, MSc, FRCPC, DTMH, MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».