MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389030819 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2226

2613. Pediatric respiratory syncytial virus hospitalizations, 2017 to 2022, the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active (IMPACT)

2023· article· en· W4389030819 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Malou Bourdeau, Nirma Khatri Vadlamudi, Christina Bancej, Nathalie Bastien, Joanne Embreé, Scott A. Halperin, Andrea Hudgin, Taj Jadavji, Kescha Kazmi, Joanne M. Langley, Marc Lebel, Nicole Le Saux, Dorothy Moore, Shaun K. Morris, Jeffrey M. Pernica, Joan Robinson, Manish Sadarangani, Julie A. Bettinger, Jesse Papenburg

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRespiratory viral infections research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioNova Scotia Health AuthoritySickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineDalhousie UniversityStollery Children's HospitalAlberta Children's HospitalIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreUniversity of ManitobaMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityPublic Health Agency of CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesSanofiGlaxoSmithKlineSeqirusModernaPfizer
Mots-clésMedicineInterquartile rangePediatricsPandemicEpidemiologyIntensive care unitImmunizationEmergency medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineImmunologyDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalizations. We aimed to describe the epidemiology and burden of RSV-associated hospitalizations among children in Canadian pediatric centers from 2017 to 2022, including changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We performed active surveillance for hospitalized children 0 to 16 years of age with laboratory confirmed RSV at 13 Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active (IMPACT) pediatric hospitals during 5 seasons (2017-18 to 2021-22). Proportions of RSV hospitalizations over all-cause hospitalizations over time, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, prolonged admissions (≥ 7-days) and mortality proportions were calculated, overall and by age groups and regions. RSV hospitalization-associated burden was compared for 2021-22 to the pre-pandemic period of 2017-18 to 2019-20. Seasonality was described using epidemic curves. Results Among 11,014 RSV-associated hospitalizations 6,035 (54.8%) were male and 5,488 (50%) were aged < 6 months. Overall, 2,594 (23.6%) were admitted to ICU, of which 60.8% were aged < 6 months old. The median hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range: 2-6). The mean number of hospitalizations during the pre-pandemic seasons was 2,522. Only 58 cases were reported in 2020-21, followed by 3,170 in 2021-22. The proportion of RSV hospitalizations over all-cause hospitalizations rose from 3.2% pre-pandemic to 4.5% in 2021-22 (difference 1.3% [95%CI 0.8-1.8]; p=0.07 after multiplicity adjustment). One province, Quebec, had a significant increase in RSV-hospitalization proportion in 2021-22 (2.5 percentage points, 95%CI 1.7-3.2, adjusted p-value 0.045). Age, sex, ICU admission, prolonged length of stay(≥7-days) and mortality proportions did not change in 2021-22 compared to the pre-pandemic period. Interregional differences in RSV seasonality were accentuated in 2021-22. Weekly RSV-associated hospital admissions in children aged 0 to 16 years at IMPACT centers, 2017-2022, by season Monthly RSV-associated hospital admissions in children aged 0 to 16 years at IMPACT centers, 2017-2022, by province Conclusion RSV hospitalization burden in Canadian pediatric hospitals is substantial, especially in infants aged < 6 months. Following a near absence in 2020-21, RSV hospitalizations increased in the 2021-22 season, but severity of illness remained similar to the pre-pandemic period. These data will aid planning of RSV prevention strategies. Disclosures Nirma K. Vadlamudi, MPH, PhD, Broadstreet HEOR: Personal fees outside of the submitted work Scott Halperin, MD, CanSino: Grant/Research Support|CanSino: served on ad hoc advisory board|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: served on ad hoc advisory board|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: served on ad hoc advisory board|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: served on ad hoc advisory board|Pfizer,: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer,: served on ad hoc advisory board|Sanofi-Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi-Pasteur: served on ad hoc advisory board|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: served on ad hoc advisory board|VBI Vaccines: Grant/Research Support|VBI Vaccines: served on ad hoc advisory board Joanne M. Langley, MD, CanSino: Grant/Research Support|Entos: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi-Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Symvivo: Grant/Research Support|VBI Vaccines: Grant/Research Support Shaun Morris, MD, MPH, DTM&H, FRCPC, FAAP, GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria|JNJ China: Honoraria|Merck: served on ad hoc advisory board|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: served on ad-hoc advisory board|Sanofi-Pasteur: served on ad-hoc advisory board Jeffrey Pernica, MD, MSc, FRCPC, DTMH, MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Manish Sadarangani, BM BCh, FRCPC, DPhil, GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Symvivo: Grant/Research Support|VBI Vaccines: Grant/Research Support Jesse Papenburg, MD, AstraZeneca: Personal fees outside of the submitted work|MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Personal fees outside of the submitted work

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,366 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesMême sujetRespiratory viral infections researchTravaux en français237 207