A Deep Learning Neural Network Method Using Linear Eigenvalue Statistics for Schizophrenic EEG Data Classification
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Electroencephalography (EEG) signals can be used as a neuroimaging indicator to analyze brain-related diseases and mental states, such as schizophrenia, which is a common and serious mental disorder. However, the main limiting factor of using EEG data to support clinical schizophrenia diagnosis lies in the inadequacy of both objective characteristics and effective data analysis techniques. Random matrix theory (RMT) and its linear eigenvalue statistics (LES) can provide an effective mathematical modeling method for exploring the statistical properties of non-stationary nonlinear systems, such as EEG signals. To obtain an accurate classification and diagnosis of schizophrenia, this paper proposes a LES-based deep learning network scheme in which a series of random matrixes, consisting of EEG data sliding window sampling and their eigenvalues, are employed as features for deep learning. Due to the fact that the performance of the LES-based scheme is sensitive to the LES’s test function, the proposed LES-based deep learning network is embedded with two ways of combining LES’s test functions with learning techniques: the first is to have the LES’s test function assigned, while, using the second way, the optimal LES’s test function should be solved in a functional optimization problem. In this paper, various test functions and different optimal learning methods were coupled in experiments. Our results revealed a binary classification accuracy of nearly 90% in distinguishing between healthy controls (HC) and patients experiencing the first episode of schizophrenia (FES). Additionally, we achieved a ternary classification accuracy of approximately 70% by including clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR). The LES-embedded approach yielded notably higher classification accuracy compared to conventional machine learning methods and standard convolutional neural networks. As the performance of schizophrenia classification is strongly influenced by test functions, a functional optimization problem was proposed to identify an optimized test function, and an approximated parameter optimization problem was introduced to limit the search area of suitable basis functions. Furthermore, the parameterization test function optimization problem and the deep learning network were coupled to be synchronously optimized during the training process. The proposal approach achieved higher classification accuracy rates of 96.87% between HC and FES, with an additional 89.06% accuracy when CHR was included. The experimental studies demonstrated that the proposed LES-based method was significantly effective for schizophrenic EEG data classification.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».