In a Classroom of their Own: The Intersection of Race and Feminist Politics in All-Black Male Schools (2018) by Keisha Lindsay
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Keisha Lindsay began by relating the story of an effort in 2010 by Kaleem Caire to establish Madison Preparatory Academy, a publicly funded, all-male school, designed to improve the academic achievement of boys of colour.Although the Madison, Wisconsin, Board of Education denied his petition, the attempt forms the backdrop for Lindsay's dialectical treatise on the views-favourable or unfavourable-on All Black Male Schools (ABMS).Local political conservatives used neoliberal theory to argue for the school.That is, neoliberal theory promised to reduce state control over local schools, embraced mandatory school uniforms, and recognized the financial and educational benefits of hiring non-union teachers.Critics of ABMSs argued that they are detrimental to Black children's psychological, academic, and socioeconomic well-being and denied unconstitutionally children equal access to publicly funded education.In Lindsay's view, single-sex Black schools ignored the needs of Black female adolescents and argue falsely that Black males and Black females learn differently.Beyond an examination of the pros and cons of ABMS, Lindsay also drew from political theory "with a heavy insistence on practice" (p.5).Lindsay's own academic background as a professor of gender and women's studies and political science made for a theoretically complex tableau that includes race, gender, and politics.Through this lens, she used the theory of intersexuality, pioneered by Black feminist women such as bell hooks, to interrogate further the opposing opinions on ABMS.But the fluid nature of intertextuality remains, and the question is always which element (e.g., race, gender, or politics) is privileged in the analysis.Presenting the case for ABMS, Lindsay pointed out the prevailing view that Black boys are disadvantaged, ignored, or dismissed because the teaching force in American schools consists of White teachers (82%) who are unfamiliar with cultural, experiential, or gendered assumptions.Contributing to the racial achievement gap is the evidence that Black boys are much more likely to be placed into special education classes, suspended from school, or drop out of school.In addition to an anti-racist argument for the establishment of such schools, proponents tend also to espouse an antifeminist politics.In reality, Black girls are more likely to be suspended or placed into special education classes than White girls.Moreover, proponents often cite that Black boys do not do as well in mixed classrooms because Black girls, who are overtly sexual, distract them.Portraying Black girls as stereotypical Jezebels who want only to distract Black boys is not supported by evidence; separating boys from girls does not improve their academic performance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».