The State of the System: A Reality Check on Canada's Schools (2020) by Paul W. Bennett
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The introduction of The State of the System: A Reality Check on Canada's Schools captured the thesis: "Everywhere you look, the march of urbanized, bureaucratic, centralized K-12 education is nearly complete, marking the triumph of the System over students, parents, teachers, and the engaged public" (p.4).The author argued that those who are closest to the classroom and the outcomes of K-12 schooling are least involved in making decisions and that high-level school and ministry of education administrators are the insiders who confine parents, teachers, students, and employers to the outside where they are subjected to top-down decisions based on managerial, rather than student learning, priorities.Bennett concluded sardonically that the education system "processes students like hamburgers in a fast-food operation" (p.4).Such stark imagery was paired with other rhetorical devices to dramatize his argument.From the first page, for example, the author personified Canadian education as "the System", justifying this with Max Weber's iron cage metaphor to suggest efficiency, rationality, and bureaucracy have "found concrete expression in … the 'School System'" (p. 5).Such an articulation reflects the lexical tendencies of critical theorists, and the reader may expect a theoretical trouncing will ensue.To be clear, however, as stated on page five, The State of the System was not an attempt to re-diagnose the problems with Canadian schooling; the author sourced both American and Canadian thinkers and scholars who preceded him in this regard.Most notably, he borrowed Lewington and Orpwood's notion of "Fortress Education" (p.13); their imagery of insiders and outsiders was Bennett's launch point, and he suggested their almost thirty-year old characterization of the problems with Canadian schooling has been "virtually unchallenged" (p. 7).Admittedly, the school reform movement has suffered from inertia according to the critiques and commentaries published by internationally reputed scholars.At key historical moments, such as the beginning of a decade (e.g., Sarason, 1990) or a millennium (e.g., Eisner, 2000), scholars have registered disappointment and cautionary tales about reform initiatives.Most recently, Murphy (2020) argued that despite the promise of America's improvement agendas, schools have not significantly changed over the decades, and innovation tends to be more aspirational than operational.Both scholarly work and practice in Canadian education have been and continue to be influenced by our southern neighbour.John Dewey's progressive philosophy, for example, made its way into more than one province, and arguably with residual
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,034 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».