MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389131209 · doi:10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.254

Contributors to this Issue

2023· article· en· W4389131209 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNineteenth-Century Literature · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIconRomanticismCitationDownloadRomanceArtHistoryArt historyLiteratureLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chris Murray is a senior lecturer in Literary Studies at Monash University. He is the author of Tragic Coleridge (Routledge, 2013) and China from the Ruins of Athens and Rome: Classics, Sinology, and Romanticism, 1793–1938 (Oxford University Press, 2020). He is a Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society, and his current project on Romantic receptions of Daoism includes his essays “Coleridge’s Daoism?” (Wordsworth Circle, 2020) and “Yeats’s Faustian Meditations” (Irish University Review, 2023). He is also at work on a project concerning the Australian reception of Romanticism with Alexis Harley and Claire Knowles, which includes the essay “Prophet Against Empire? Blake in Australia” (Blake: An Illustrated Quarterly, 2023).Mattias Pirholt is a professor in the Department of Literature at Uppsala University. He is author of Grenzerfahrungen: Studien zu Goethes Ästhetik (Winter, 2018) and co-editor of Beyond Autonomy in Eighteenth-Century British and German Aesthetics with Karl Axelsson and Camilla Flodin (Routledge, 2021). Professor Pirholt has also been a visiting scholar at Free University Berlin, the University of Tubingen, Columbia University, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. ***Emily Harrington is an Associate Professor of English at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Harrington is the author of Second Person Singular: Late Victorian Women Poets and the Bonds of Verse (Virginia University Press, 2014) and “Richard Le Gallienne and the Rhymers: Masculine Minority in the 1890s,” in Extraordinary Aesthetes: Decadents, New Women, and Fin-de-Siècle Culture (edited by Joseph Bristow; University of Toronto Press, 2023). Her work has also appeared in Victorian Poetry, Victorian Studies, and Studies in English Literature, and her most recent piece, “Night Lights: the 1890s Nocturne,” is forthcoming in Nineteenth-Century Literature in Transition: the 1890s (edited by Dustin Friedman and Kristin Mahoney; Cambridge University Press).Anne Stiles is a Professor of English and Coordinator of Medical Humanities at Saint Louis University. Stiles is the author of Children’s Literature and the Rise of “Mind Cure”: Positive Thinking and Pseudo-Science at the Fin de Siècle (Cambridge University Press, 2020) and Popular Fiction and Brain Science in the Late Nineteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2012). She edited Neurology and Literature, 1866–1920 (Palgrave, 2007) and co-edited two volumes published by Elsevier in 2013 as part of their Progress in Brain Research series. Stiles has also held long-term grants from the Institute for Research in the Humanities at the University of Wisconsin, Madison (2016–2017); the Huntington Library (2009–2010); and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2006–2007). She is currently writing about popular misunderstandings of radioactivity in the later fiction of bestselling author Marie Corelli.Timothy Sweet is Eberly Family Distinguished Professor of American Literature at West Virginia University. He has written numerous books on the Civil War and environmental humanities, including Traces of War: Poetry, Photography, and the Crises of the Union (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990), Literary Cultures of the Civil War (editor; University of Georgia Press, 2016), American Georgics: Economy and Environment in Early American Literature (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), and Extinction and the Human: Four American Encounters (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021). Professor Sweet is also the 2023 recipient of the Henry David Thoreau Society’s Walter Harding Award for distinguished achievement.Melissa Gniadek is an Associate Professor of English at the University of Toronto. Professor Gniadek is the author of Oceans at Home: Maritime and Domestic Fictions in Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Writing (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021) as well as numerous articles and book chapters on nineteenth-century U.S. engagement with the Pacific and literary engagement with histories of settler colonialism. Currently, Professor Gniadek is at work on a monograph concerned with unsettling temporalities of settlement in nineteenth-century American literature. She is also at work on another project about Herman Melville and trees in global contexts.Erik Gray is a Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University. He is the author of several books, including The Poetry of Indifference: From the Romantics to the Rubáiyát (University of Massachusetts Press, 2005), Milton and the Victorians (Cornell University Press, 2009), and The Art of Love Poetry (Oxford University Press, 2018). Professor Gray is also co-editor of a forthcoming anthology of Victorian poetry from Broadview Press.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,386
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,292 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle