MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389142016 · doi:10.1353/abr.2023.a913433

Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents by Stephanie L. Herdrich and Sylvia Yount (review)

2023· article· en· W4389142016 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Garden Castro

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book review · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGeographies of human-animal interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionArt historyArtPaintingSculptureNarrativeHistoryLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents by Stephanie L. Herdrich and Sylvia Yount Jan Garden Castro (bio) winslow homer: crosscurrents Stephanie L. Herdrich and Sylvia Yount The Metropolitan Museum of Art (Distributed by Yale University Press) https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9781588397478/winslow-homer/ 200 pages; Cloth, $50.00 Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents, the catalog for the exhibition traveling to the National Gallery, London (10 September 2022–8 January 2023), underscores the show's point: Homer applied his powerful painting prowess and narrative talent to capture both ocean and societal crosscurrents. Sylvia Yount terms this his "lifelong concerns with race and the environment." Yount is the Lawrence A. Fleischman Curator in Charge of the American Wing of The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Her colleague Stephanie L. Herdrich, Associate Curator of American Painting and Sculpture in the American Wing, closes the volume by discussing how the artist framed race, class, and gender disparities as he painted nature's magnificence and its destructive force. The Gulf Stream, an 1899 painting reworked by 1906, is the show's centerpiece, displaying a lone Black man adrift at sea in a boat with a broken mast, surrounded by sharks. Homer used the sea literally and metaphorically in an age following the Civil War and Reconstruction, when Jim Crow laws and racist violence marginalized and endangered the Black populace. Herdrich's essay, "Crosscurrents: Conflict, Nature, and Mortality in Winslow Homer's Art," dives into the vortex of this exhibition and painting as she quotes curator H. Barbara Weinberg's comment that The Gulf Stream and other paintings "seem to ask as many questions as they answer." The same could be said about this exhibition and catalog. Experts mention Homer's one month of classes in the Barbizon style in New York and mostly speculate about the rest of his art education. Even though Homer's father and brother [End Page 149] are mentioned and seem central to his life, readers learn almost nothing about Homer's family or friends. We are sent to footnoted sources if we're curious about whether he had any romantic relationships. Similarly, we are told that the water currents of the Atlantic are central to Homer's body of work but given only general information that Homer's knowledge of this body of water came from oceanographer Matthew Fontaine Maury and was filtered through a religious source, George Chaplin Child, who believed in divine providence. Ocean patterns are discussed only as they were historically understood in 1857. Herdrich's best discussion of currents is in her consideration of The Herring Net (1885), where she points out "the inherent dangers of fishing the Grand Banks, the rich waters southeast of Newfoundland, where the cold Labrador Current meets the relatively warm Gulf Stream." The authors do not update Maury's notions of how ocean currents operate. Readers are left to their own resources to update this by factoring climate change into Homer's portraits of land and sea and to ponder, as Homer did, how humans variously interact with nature and how race, class, gender, and north-south cultural differences were also crosscurrents. Herdrich delves into how Homer took years to finalize The Gulf Stream. Using elements of sharks and a boat disaster he had painted in 1885, he added more menacing sharks. In the final composition, the sugarcane from the sketches is more central and sharks more numerous and menacing, without going as far as the 1885 watercolor showing sharks circling a tipping, now-empty boat. There is no discussion of the use of threatening, open-mouthed sharks as a symbol in earlier art. According to Adelheid M. Gealt, emerita professor specializing in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century iconography, a J. S. Copley 1778 painting with an open-mouthed shark alludes to Rubens's 1618 Jonah and the Whale. Hopeful signs in Homer's painting are a possible rescue ship on the far horizon and word links to family and America—the boat is named Anna, and its port of origin is Key West. In 1899, Homer revealed to a friend that he considered The Gulf Stream's figures "of about the same value to the picture" as those in J. M. W. Turner's...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,176
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,006
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,355
Écart entre enseignants0,335 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book reviewMême sujetGeographies of human-animal interactionsTravaux en français237 207