MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389219846 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-190650

Neurocognitive Outcomes over the First 3 Months after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR T) Therapy: Preliminary Findings from a Longitudinal Study

2023· article· en· W4389219846 sur OpenAlexaff
Samantha Mayo, Kim Edelstein, Lori J. Bernstein, Tiana Coley, Stacey Morrison, Abi Vijenthira, Manjula Maganti, John Kuruvilla, Michael Crump, Sita Bhella, Robert Kridel, Vishal Kukreti, Chloe Yang, Shabbir MH Alibhai, Christine Chen, Anca Prica

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeurocognitiveNeuropsychologyVerbal learningVerbal memoryNeuropsychological assessmentMedicineCognitionTrail Making TestPsychologyCohortExecutive functionsRecallClinical psychologyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction People treated with systemic therapies for cancer may exhibit changes in neurocognitive functioning over time, affecting domains such as memory, processing speed, and executive functioning. There is a need for prospective data regarding neurocognitive outcomes among patients treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR T) therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trajectory of neurocognitive performance and self-reported cognitive functioning over the first 3 months of CAR T therapy. Methods As part of a larger cohort study of patients treated with CAR T, neurocognitive outcomes were assessed prior to starting CAR T and again at 1- and 3- months post-CAR T. Neurocognitive performance was measured using standardized neuropsychological tests including measures of verbal memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - immediate recall, delayed recall, retention), processing speed (Trail-making Test - Part A (TMT-A)) and executive functioning (Trail-making Test Part B (TMT-B), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)). Raw test scores were converted to z-scores (Mean 0, SD 1) based on norms adjusted for age, sex, and education, where applicable. Impairment on individual tests was defined by a z score ≤ -1.64. Participants were categorized as showing overall impairment if they had at least two tests with a z-score of ≤ -1.5 or a z-score ≤ -2.0 on one test. Self-reported cognitive functioning was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognition, Perceived Cognitive Impairment score (FACT-Cog3 PCI) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30, Cognitive Functioning scale (EORTC QLQ-C30 CF). Demographic and clinical data were collected through self-report and patient records. Frequencies of impairment were determined at each time point, with clinically significant changes on individual test scores in the first month determined based on z-score changes of ≥1.0 or minimal clinically important differences for self-report questionnaires. Linear mixed models were generated to estimate the trajectory of neurocognitive performance and self-reported cognitive functioning over time from baseline to 3 months. Results Neurocognitive outcomes were available for 37 participants at baseline, with follow-up data available for 29 patients at 1 month and 17 patients at 3 months. Participants were 54% male, had a mean age 58.4 years (sd 11.3) and a mean 15.5 years (sd 3.2) education. All patients had a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (53% diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 31% transformed DLBCL from follicular lymphoma). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) affected 32% of patients (5% Grade 4, 3% Grade 3, 8% Grade 2, 16% Grade 1). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) affected 97% of patients (3% Grade 3, 76% Grade 2, 19% Grade 1). Frequency of overall impairment at each time point was 10/37 (27%) at baseline, 12/29 (41.4%) at 1 month, and 3/17 (17.6%) at 3 months. At each time point, impairment was most common on tests of executive functioning and memory. Based on individual test score changes between baseline and 1 month, rates of decline on individual tests of neurocognitive performance ranged from 11.5% (TMT-A) to 34.6% (COWAT). Decline on self-reported cognitive functioning was observed for 14.3% (FACT-Cog PCI) and 28.6% (EORTC QLQ-C30 CF) of participants. Based on mixed models (Table 1), there was a statistically significant decline in estimated mean z-scores on a test of executive function (COWAT: -0.52, 95% CI -0.89-(-0.16), p=0.007) at 1-month compared to baseline. At three months, there was a statistically significant improvement in estimated mean z-scores on memory (HVLT-R immediate recall: 0.56, 95% CI 0.11-1.01, p=0.017) and executive functioning (TMT-B: 0.87, 95% CI 0.17-1.57, p=0.019; COWAT: 0.68, 95% CI 0.19-1.16, p=0.009) compared to baseline. Conclusions Impairment is present in a subgroup of patients prior to starting CAR T therapy. Patients may demonstrate declines on performance-based measures and report worsening cognitive symptoms in the first month after CAR T therapy, but also improved performance in some domains by three months. Enrollment and long-term follow-up of patients in this study is ongoing. Future analyses will explore differences in trajectories among subgroups, such as those who have experienced ICANS and CRS.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesTravaux en français237 207