Clinical Factors Associated with Cytokine Release Syndrome and Dosing Recommendations for Restarting Elranatamab Following an Interruption
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND In the MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) study, elranatamab (ELRA) administered at a dose of 76 mg once-weekly (QW) with 2 step-up priming doses of 12 mg on day 1 and 32 mg on day 4 had a manageable safety profile, with 56.3% of patients developing cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 98.8% of events occurring with the first 3 doses. Here, we report clinical factors associated with CRS and dosing recommendations for restarting treatment after dose interruptions in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) undergoing treatment with ELRA. METHODS Eligible patients received ELRA subcutaneously in step-up priming doses of 12 and 32 mg on days 1 and 4 of cycle 1, respectively, followed by 76 mg of ELRA QW. CRS events were graded according to the criteria of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and managed according to published guidelines. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify clinical factors associated with CRS. Baseline factors (extramedullary disease by BICR, prior antibody-drug conjugate, prior CAR-T, number of prior lines of therapy [≤5, >5], sex, and age [continuous variable]) were included in the model for CRS after the initial dose, and only post-baseline factors (time to previous CRS and time to initial tocilizumab use) were included in the model for CRS after the second dose. A previously described population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was used to simulate different interruption scenarios and determine how long it takes for ELRA exposure to drop below the threshold associated with CRS events (Hibma J, et al. Poster presented at PAGE 31 2023 [abstract 10648]). The data used to develop this model was collected from the following open-label elranatamab trials: MagnetisMM-1 (NCT03269136; phase 1), MagnetisMM-2 (NCT04798586; phase 1), MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359; phase 2), and MagnetisMM-9 (NCT05014412; phase 1/2). Of 183 patients who were treated in MagnetisMM-3 with the 2 step-up priming dosing, 106 patients (57.9%) experienced CRS, 43.7% grade 1, 13.7% grade 2, and 0.5% grade 3. Tocilizumab was used to manage CRS. Of the 130 CRS events, 37 (28.5%; 20 grade 1 and 17 grade ≥2) were treated with tocilizumab, and 93 (71.5%; 82 grade 1 and 11 grade ≥2) were not. After the initial elranatamab dose, 79/183 patients had CRS. The presence of extramedullary disease was predictive of a decreased risk of CRS after the initial dose. Of the 180 who received a second elranatamab dose, 35 had CRS afterwards. In a multivariable model also adjusting for CRS after the initial dose, prior tocilizumab use was predictive of a decreased risk of CRS after the second dose. After receiving doses of 76 mg of ELRA, 16 instances of dose delays lasting >6 to ≤12 weeks were observed. In most of these instances (11/16; 68.8%), patients did not repeat the 32-mg step-up dose. In 5 instances, patients restarted treatment with 32 mg of ELRA. No patients experienced CRS after retreatment. For the 4 instances of dose delays lasting >12 weeks after a 76-mg dose, patients repeated the 32-mg step-up dose in 2 instances, and patients received >32 mg ELRA after the interruption in the other 2 instances, with none experiencing CRS after retreatment. With dose delays of 6-12 weeks, ELRA exposure decreases below the C max after a 32-mg dose but not less than that for the 12-mg dose. With dose delays >12 weeks, ELRA exposure decreases below the C max after a 12-mg dose. To minimize the risk of CRS events after dose interruptions, clinical and PK data and modeling were used to develop recommendations for restarting therapy (Figure). CONCLUSIONS Extramedullary disease and use of tocilizumab were associated with a decreased risk of CRS. Based on clinical and PK data and modeling, it is recommended that patients receiving 76 mg ELRA who then experience dose delays lasting 6-12 or >12 weeks should restart treatment at doses of 32 or 12 mg, respectively.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».