MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389221243 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-174057

Experience with Emicizumab Among People with Hemophilia A in the Canadian Hemophilia Bleeding Disorders Registry

2023· article· en· W4389221243 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Man‐Chiu Poon, Adrienne Lee, Federico Germini, Arun Keepanasseril, Quazi Ibrahim, Letizia Polito, Katya Moreno, Michelle Santos, Emma Iserman, Davide Matino, Alfonso Iorio

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaRoche (Canada)University of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBleedCohortPediatricsInternal medicineSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: The use of emicizumab as prophylaxis to prevent bleeding or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in congenital hemophilia A (HA) was approved by Health Canada for the treatment of people living with HA (PwHA) with FVIII inhibitors in 2018, and without inhibitors in 2019. Here we present the results of a non-interventional, cohort study, using data routinely collected by the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) to evaluate treatment patterns of emicizumab in Canada and the associated safety and effectiveness outcomes, including quality of life. Methods: De-identified data were extracted from the CBDR database for all registered PwHA who had received emicizumab at least once prior to December 31, 2022. Baseline demographic characteristics were stratified by disease severity (defined by the level of endogenous FVIII activity) and age. Effectiveness outcomes were measured by the proportion of patients with zero, traumatic, spontaneous, or joint bleeds as well as annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for any treated bleed. Intra-patient comparisons of bleeding were performed for all patients and for those with at least six months follow-up in both pre- and post-emicizumab periods as a sensitivity analysis. Effectiveness outcomes also included patients' Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE), and EQ-5D index and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. We performed a complete data analysis, without imputation. This study was approved by the research ethics board of McMaster University and other participating centers, and abides by the guiding principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: In total, 533 PwHA received at least one dose of emicizumab (PwHA E) in the CBDR database. Overall, 498 (93.4%) PwHA E had severe disease, 28 (5.3%) had moderate disease, and 7 (1.3%) had mild disease. At start of emicizumab exposure, 220 (41.3%) PwHA E were <18 years old; 78 (14.6%) PwHA E had current FVIII inhibitors, 82 (15.4%) had a history of FVIII inhibitors, and 373 (70%) had no history of inhibitors ( Table 1). A total of 13 adverse events were reported in the entire observation period, including one event of thrombosis (occurring in one person with COVID-19), seven allergic reactions, two FVIII Inhibitor development, two neurological events (headache; and headache, nausea, and vomiting) and one case of large hematoma developed at operative site following removal of port-a-cath. Moreover, nine COVID-19 cases were reported as adverse events. Over a median (first quartile, third quartile) follow-up time of 249 (136, 395) days, 388 (72.8%) PwHA E had no recorded bleeds. Out of 145 PwHA E with recorded bleeds, 106 had joint bleeds, 87 had traumatic bleeds, 69 had spontaneous bleeds and 46 had other bleeds (Table 2). An intra-patient comparison in all PwHA E (n=533) showed a decrease in mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) from 1.22 (1.06, 1.42), pre-emicizumab (2018, prior to first dose) to 0.50 (0.41, 0.60) post-emicizumab (rate ratio (95% CI) 0.41 (0.33, 0.50), p-value <0.001). The Intra-patient comparison in PwHA E without current inhibitor (n=455) showed a decrease in mean ABR (95% CI) from 1.02 (0.87, 1.19) to 0.54 (0.44, 0.66) (rate ratio (95% CI) 0.53 (0.43, 0.65), p-value <0.001). The Intra-patient comparison in PwHA E with current inhibitor (n=78) showed a decrease in mean ABR (95% CI) from 5.03 (3.30, 7.66) to 0.41 (0.26, 0.65) (rate ratio (95% CI) 0.08 (0.04, 0.15), p-value <0.001). Conclusions: This analysis describes the baseline characteristics, safety and effectiveness outcomes of Canadian PwHA treated with emicizumab before December 31, 2022. A total of 387 new patients were included in this analysis compared to the previous one (data cut: December 31, 2021, n=146). The data shows that 72.8% PwHA E had no recorded bleeds since they started emicizumab and that there was a substantial decrease in bleeds post-emicizumab in both PwHA with and without current FVIII inhibitor. The safety profile of emicizumab was consistent with previous reports. The CBDR allows for a longitudinal follow-up of the Canadian hemophilia A population, which can inform healthcare practitioners and regulatory authorities of the safety and efficacy outcomes of treatments in routine clinical practice.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,087
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,175

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→