MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389222044 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-174139

Multi-Dimensional Molecular and Tumor-Microenvironment Analysis of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

2023· article· en· W4389222044 sur OpenAlexaff
Tomohiro Aoki, Gerben Duns, Shinya Rai, Andrew Lytle, Yifan Yin, Clémentine Sarkozy, Stacy Hung, Katy Milne, Adèle Telenius, Luke O’Brien, Celia Strong, Talia Goodyear, Shaocheng Wu, Katsuyoshi Takata, Tomoko Miyata‐Takata, Merrill Boyle, Susana Ben‐Neriah, Andrew P. Weng, Andrew Roth, Anca Prica, Robert Kridel, Brad H. Nelson, Pedro Farinha, Kerry J. Savage, David W. Scott, Christian Steidl

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of VictoriaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkSpinal Cord Injury BC
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyNeuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homologCancer researchTumor microenvironmentCDKN2ALymphomaATRXComparative genomic hybridizationGene expression profilingCancerKRASGeneImmunologyMutationGene expressionGeneticsChromosome

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (CHL) is currently classified into histological subtypes based on morphology and antigen marker expression. However, additional biological features might help guide treatment strategies and inform prognosis. Here, we aimed to uncover disease heterogeneity and biologic subtypes of CHL based on multi-dimensional molecular profiling ( Fig A) capturing somatic gene mutations, malignant cell expression phenotypes and altered tumor microenvironment (TME) architecture. METHODS We performed exome/targeted sequencing on flow-sorted or micro-dissected HRS cells from fresh-frozen CHL biopsies (n=116) of patients treated at BC Cancer. In addition, we constructed tissue microarrays (TMA) from this cohort on which we performed GeoMx® Whole Transcriptome Assay (WTA) to obtain gene expression profiles from CD30+ HRS cells and multiplexed imaging analyses using multi-colour immunofluorescence (mIF) to delineate the spatial TME ecosystem. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify outcome differences according to molecular features in CHL patients treated with ABVD-like chemotherapy (n=104). Results Mutational and copy number analyses identified known recurrent driver events including mutations and copy number changes in SOCS1, STAT6, TNFAIP3, B2M, REL and the PDL1/PDL2 locus. These mutational findings provided a statistically powered framework to investigate the association between genomic alterations with pathological and clinical disease parameters including outcomes. Mutations affecting BCL7A, TNFAIP3, and 2p15 (REL) amplifications were strongly enriched in EBV- CHL compared to EBV+ CHL. In line with “thymic mutations” reported in grey zone lymphoma, STAT6, GNA13, ITPKB, and TBL1XR1 mutations were significantly enriched in CHL with involvement of the anterior mediastinum. ZNF217, SPEN and CD58 mutations were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (all P < .01). When investigating outcome correlation according to age group, genomic alteration in STAT6 including both single nucleotide variants and STAT6 amplification, was the most significant feature associated with unfavorable PFS in patients <45 years of age ( P = .013). Alterations in the antigen recognition system, including loss of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is one of the most studied mechanisms of immune escape in CHL. Mutations in CSF2RB, GNA13, TNFAIP3, and STAT6 were significantly associated with MHC-I loss. Strikingly, all cases harboring CSF2RB mutations (n=23) also showed loss of MHC-I. GeoMx analysis revealed that IFN-a and IFN-g pathways were significantly upregulated in MHC-I+ HRS cells. Mutations in HIST1H1E and BCL7A were significantly enriched in cases with loss of both MHC-I and MHC-II expression. To define mutational subtypes of CHL, we next applied non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) consensus clustering and discovered four robust subsets of tumors (clusters) using recurrent genomic events. Cluster1 (C1) is characterized by mutations in TNFAIP3, CSF2RB and GNA13, younger age, loss of MHC-I, and up-regulation of GCB and fatty acid metabolism signatures. C2 was associated with old age at initial diagnosis, EBV positivity and significant upregulation of the IFN-g pathway. C3 is characterized by REL and STAT6 amplification andexpression of a DNA repair signature. C4 includes samples from mostly younger patients with STAT6 and B2M mutations and high expression of CCL17 by HRS cells. MIF analyses further identified correlations between each mutational NMF cluster and TME composition ( Fig B), and in particular specific CD4+ T cell subsets. The TME of tumors was significantly enriched by C1: FOXP3+Tregs, C2: LAG3+CD4+ cells, and C3: PD1+CD4+ cells. C4 tumors showed no positive correlation with any of these immune cell compartments. C2 tumors were also significantly associated with the abundance of CD68+ macrophages. Conclusion Our multi-dimensional profiling approach enabled us to delineate molecular profiles of HRS cells that are linked to distinct TME patterns. These linkages have implications for current pathogenesis models, molecular subtyping of CHL, and identification of cellular vulnerabilities that might be therapeutically exploitable via targeting of HRS cell phenotypes and/or immune escape mechanisms.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→