MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389222216 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-173420

Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Health Outcomes in a Real-World Population of Patients with Myelofibrosis Treated with Fedratinib

2023· article· en· W4389222216 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesco Passamonti, Rohan Parikh, Siddhi Korgaonkar, Manoj Chevli, Samantha Slaff, Julien Rombi, Basirat Adeyemi, Keith L. Davis, Aylin Yücel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesSwedish Orphan BiovitrumEisaiGilead SciencesBristol-Myers Squibb
Mots-clésMedicineMyelofibrosisRuxolitinibDiscontinuationMyeloproliferative neoplasmPopulationConstitutional symptomsInternal medicinePediatricsAnemiaInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemBone marrowMyelodysplastic syndromesDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a type of myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, progressive anemia, and debilitating constitutional symptoms. Fedratinib (FEDR) is a selective Janus kinase-2 inhibitor (JAK2i) approved for the treatment of adult patients with intermediate (int)-2 or high-risk primary or secondary MF. Patients with MF have a median overall survival of 5-7 years; however, prior to FEDR approval, ruxolitinib (RUX) was the only approved JAK2i for MF treatment, with the majority of patients discontinuing RUX within 3 years of treatment initiation (Harrison C, et al. Ann Hematol 2020;99:1177-1191). Given the current availability and use of FEDR, the primary study objective was to describe demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients with MF receiving FEDR in real-world practice settings after prior RUX treatment. A secondary objective was to assess changes in MF-related symptoms and spleen size during FEDR treatment. Methods: We report interim data from a medical records review of adult patients with MF who received FEDR treatment after RUX discontinuation (due to treatment refractoriness, relapse, or intolerance) in Canada (CAN), Germany (GER), and the United Kingdom (UK). Data collection is ongoing, and we present data abstracted from March through May 2023. Patients were required to have an int-2 or high-risk MF diagnosis at FEDR initiation and to have initiated FEDR after date of first availability in each country (CAN: Sep 21, 2020, GER: Feb 9, 2021, UK: Nov 1, 2021) up to 6 months prior to data abstraction. Patients who received allogenic, hematopoietic cell transplantation after initial MF diagnosis or participated in a JAK2i trial were excluded. Spleen size evaluation through palpation at FEDR initiation and at least once within the first 6 months of FEDR use was required. Study outcomes measured were patient characteristics, treatment patterns, MF-related symptoms, and spleen size evaluations. Descriptive statistics are reported. Results: A total of 58 patients (CAN: 13, GER: 32, UK: 13) were included in the analysis. Median age at MF diagnosis and FEDR initiation was 67.9 and 71.8 years, respectively. 65.5% of patients were male, and 91.4% were White. Most patients were diagnosed with primary MF (60.3%) and had JAK2 V617F mutation (84.5%). Among patients who had a bone marrow biopsy (n = 51), 58.8% had grade 2 bone marrow fibrosis. Mean baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 2.5. Median time from MF diagnosis and RUX treatment discontinuation to FEDR initiation was 34.0 months and 0.7 months, respectively. Most common reasons for FEDR initiation were splenomegaly (75.9%), RUX failure (67.2%), and to achieve symptom control (63.8%) (Table). Over a median follow-up of 12.1 months after FEDR initiation, 19 patients (32.7%) discontinued FEDR treatment with a median treatment duration of 7.7 months. Among the 39 patients taking FEDR at data abstraction, median treatment duration was 12.5 months. At FEDR initiation, 48.3% and 51.7% had int-2 risk and high-risk MF, respectively. The most common MF-related symptoms presented were fatigue (74.1%), abdominal discomfort (63.8%), and night sweats (46.6%) (Table). 62.1% of patients initiated FEDR treatment at the recommended therapeutic dose of 400 mg, and 74.1% were receiving 400 mg at end of follow-up/treatment discontinuation. Among patients with ≥ 1 FEDR dose change, titration to therapeutic dose (68.4%) was the most common reason for their first dose change. MF-related symptoms decreased in the first 6 months of FEDR treatment, including fatigue (74.1% [at FEDR initiation] reduced to 52.8% [at 6 months after FEDR initiation]), abdominal discomfort (63.8% reduced to 11.3%), and night sweats (46.6% reduced to 3.8%). The proportion of patients with severe (palpable spleen:> 20 cm) and moderate splenomegaly (palpable spleen: 11-20 cm) decreased from FEDR initiation to 6 months after initiation (severe splenomegaly: 32.8% to 7.5%, moderate splenomegaly: 55.2% to 15.1%) (Figure). Conclusion: Thepatients included in this study exhibited a significant level of illness . In this interim analysis, patients treated with FEDR following RUX treatment failure showed resolution of MF-related symptoms and a marked decrease in splenomegaly in the initial 6-month period, demonstrating the real-world effectiveness of FEDR treatment in patients with MF.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207