Incremental Burden Associated with Dose Escalation in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Treated with Complement Inhibitors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by complement-mediated hemolytic anemia. Terminal complement component C5 inhibitors eculizumab (ECU) and ravulizumab (RAVU) inhibit the formation of membrane attack complex, and thereby ameliorates intravascular hemolysis in PNH. Some patients exhibit breakthrough intravascular hemolysis near the end of 14-day treatment cycle for ECU or 8-week treatment cycle for RAVU. To manage breakthrough hemolysis, different treatment strategies may be attempted in the clinical practice, including shortening the dosing interval and/or increasing the dose of ECU and RAVU. This study aimed to estimate the incremental costs associated with dose escalation in patients with PNH treated with ECU or RAVU in the US. Methods: Adult (age ≥18 years) patients with PNH (ICD-10-CM code D59.5) treated with ECU or RAVU from health plan claims data (01/01/2011 to 09/30/2022) with ≥3 months of continuous health plan coverage following the first claim for ECU or RAVU were included in this retrospective cohort study. Dosing patterns were investigated during the maintenance phase. Consistent with label-recommended dosing schedule, the maintenance phase started from day 29 and day 15 post-first claim for ECU and RAVU, respectively, until the earliest of treatment discontinuation/loss to follow-up/end of data. Dose escalation for ECU was defined as 1) an increased dose (i.e., 1,200 or 1,500 mg) and/or 2) an increased infusion frequency (i.e., ≥2 infusions within 12 days). Patient-weight information was not available; dose escalation for RAVU was defined as an increased infusion frequency (i.e., ≥2 infusions within 49 days). All-cause and PNH-related direct healthcare costs measured during maintenance phase for the overall cohort and subgroup of patients with dose escalation were assessed for ECU and RAVU separately. Incremental costs associated with dose escalation in the pre vs. post dose escalation period were assessed for ECU and RAVU separately; p-values from Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were reported. Results: A total of 278 patients treated with ECU (mean± SD age, 42±13 years; 60% female) were included in the overall cohort and a subgroup of 151 patients were observed with a dose escalation (mean±SD age, 41±13 years; 58% female). For the overall ECU cohort (N=278), during a mean follow-up of 23 months, total all-cause and PNH-related costs (mean±SD) were $67,650±$32,518 and $65,751±$31,379 per patient per month (PPPM), respectively. In the subgroup of patients with dose escalation (N=151), over a mean follow-up of 30 months, total all-cause and PNH-related costs (mean±SD) were $71,466±$33,452 and $69,471±$31,595 PPPM, respectively. In the overall cohort and subgroup of patients with dose escalation, PNH-related treatment costs represented 90% and 92% of total all-cause costs respectively. A total of 171 patients treated with RAVU (mean± SD age, 39±12 years; 43% female) were included in the overall cohort and a subgroup of 26 patients were observed with a dose escalation (i.e., increased infusion frequency only) (mean± SD age, 37±11 years; 54% female). For the overall RAVU cohort (N=171), during a mean follow-up of 17 months, total all-cause and PNH-related costs (mean±SD) were $50,779±$26,258 and $49,213±$25,751 PPPM, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with dose escalation (N=26), over a mean follow-up of 20 months, total all-cause and PNH-related costs (mean±SD) were $52,819±$20,965 and $50,740±$20,837 PPPM, respectively. In the overall cohort and subgroup of patients with dose escalation, PNH-related treatment costs represented 93% and 91% of total all-cause costs, respectively. Incremental costs (mean cost differences) associated with dose escalation for ECU were of $16,861 (p<0.01) and $15,956 (p<0.01) PPPM for all-cause and PNH-related total costs, respectively; and for RAVU were of $4,950 (p<0.05) and $3,738 (p=0.06) PPPM for all-cause and PNH-related total costs, respectively (Figures 1A and 1B). Conclusions: In this study of PNH patients treated with C5 inhibitors, dose escalation was associated with significant incremental costs for both ECU and RAVU. Further research is warranted to clarify the reasons for dose escalation, which may potentially indicate an unmet clinical need for more efficacious treatment options to help prevent breakthrough symptoms and reduce the burden of PNH.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».