MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389229589 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-181299

Low Rebleed Incidence with Eptacog Beta Treatment through 24 and 48 Hours in Children (<12 years) with Hemophilia a or B with Inhibitors

2023· article· en· W4389229589 sur OpenAlexaff
Steven W. Pipe, Johannes Oldenburg, Manuel Carção, Meera Chitlur, Yesim Dargaud, Joanna A. Davis, Carmen Escuriola, C. R. M. Hay, Cédric Hermans, Nina Hwang, Víctor Jiménez‐Yuste, Craig M. Kessler, Johnny Mahlangu, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Catherine McGuinn, Wolfgang Miesbach, Tammuella Chrisentery-Singleton, Courtney D. Thornburg, Michael Wang, Daniel Bonzo, Ian S. Mitchell, Thomas A. Wilkinson, Amy L. Dunn

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBleedMedicineIncidence (geometry)DosingPopulationInternal medicineSurgeryFactor IXPediatricsGastroenterology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Persons with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors (PwHABI) who are not on prophylaxis may have high rates of bleeding, and, if not treated effectively, may have significant morbidity related to rebleeding. Dosing strategies of bypassing agents (BPAs) are variable in clinical practice, and following a period of initial bleed control, rebleeding may occur. The development of additional bypassing agents that can minimize the incidence of rebleeding in this patient population is an important medical need. Eptacog beta is a recombinant activated human factor VII approved in the US and Mexico (Sevenfact®, 2020), as well as the EU and UK (Cevenfacta®, 2022) as a BPA for the treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs) in PwHABI aged 12 years and older using two initial dose regimens (IDRs) of 75 or 225 µg/kg. In the EU and UK, eptacog beta is also indicated for preventing bleeding in the setting of surgery and other invasive procedures. Approval in the US and Mexico was based on demonstrated efficacy in the pivotal phase 3 PERSEPT 1 trial (NCT02020369), which included 27 adolescent and adult PwHABI who treated 465 mild or moderate BEs. Bleed resolution at 24 hours post-initial infusion was 96.7% and 99.5% for 75 and 225 µg/kg IDRs, respectively, with a single bleed recurrence observed before 24 hours. The subsequent phase 3 PERSEPT 2 trial (NCT02448680) enrolled 25 PwHABI <12 years of age who treated 546 mild or moderate BEs. Bleed resolution at 24 hours post-initial infusion in these pediatric patients was 97.4% and 98.0% for 75 and 225 µg/kg IDRs, respectively. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the incidence of rebleeding when treating mild or moderate BEs in PwHABI <12 years of age with eptacog beta during PERSEPT 2 at 24 and 48 hours post-initial dose. Methods PwHABI in PERSEPT 2 were randomized to either the 75 or the 225 µg/kg IDR to treat BEs and were crossed over to the alternate IDR every 3 months. No subjects in PERSEPT 2 were using prophylaxis. Subjects assigned to the 75 µg/kg IDR treated BEs with initial doses of 75 µg/kg eptacog beta followed by 75 µg/kg q3h as needed. Subjects assigned to the 225 µg/kg IDR treated BEs with an initial 225 µg/kg eptacog beta dose, followed after 9 hours by 75 µg/kg q3h as needed. Mild or moderate BE treatment success at a given time point was assessed by the patient or caregiver and was defined as obtaining a hemostasis evaluation of “excellent” or “good” on a 4-point scale with no additional eptacog beta being infused, no alternative hemostatic agents or blood products being used, and no increase in pain following the first “excellent” or “good” assessment. For this analysis, a BE was considered a rebleed if occurring at the same anatomical location as the original bleed, and within 24 or 48 hours of the initial infusion for the original bleed. Results During the study, subjects treated 546 BEs. Nine rebleeds occurred among 4 of the 25 children within 24 hours, and 13 rebleeds occurred among 6 children within 48 hours. The rebleed incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through 24 hours was 1.3% [95% CI: 0.0%, 3.6%] for the 75 µg/kg IDR and 2.0% [95% CI: 0.0%, 3.9%] for the 225 µg/kg IDR. The corresponding rebleed incidence and 95% CIs through 48 hours for the 75 and 225 µg/kg IDRs were 2.1% [95% CI: 0.0%, 4.5%] and 2.6% [95% CI: 0.4%, 4.9%], respectively. The differences in rebleed incidence between the two IDRs were not statistically significant at either 24 or 48 hours (Figure 1). The overall rebleed incidence in PERSEPT 2 was 1.6% [95% CI: 0.0%, 3.7%] through 24 hours and 2.4% [95% CI: 0.2%, 4.5%] through 48 hours. No treatment-related adverse events or thrombotic complications were observed. Conclusions Eptacog beta demonstrated a low overall incidence of rebleeding through 24 hours (1.6%) and 48 hours (2.4%) in PwHABI <12 years of age during PERSEPT 2. Rebleeding was similarly low for either IDR at both time points. These findings align with those previously reported for PERSEPT 1 in adolescent and adult patients. Combined with the high efficacy at 24 hours (>96%) observed in both trials and both IDRs, these results suggest that eptacog beta can provide clinicians and caregivers with a treatment option that can establish and maintain hemostatic control of mild or moderate BEs in PwHABI of all ages.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→