MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389231147 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-178085

Improving the Utilization and Tolerability of Thiotepa-Based Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Primary CNS Lymphoma

2023· article· en· W4389231147 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Puckrin, Colin A. Stewart, Carolyn Owen, Lesley Street, Sarah Perry, Peter Duggan, Mona Shafey, Neil Chua, Douglas A. Stewart

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThioTEPAMedicineTolerabilityBusulfanTransplantationAutologous stem-cell transplantationInternal medicineRituximabOncologyPrimary central nervous system lymphomaPopulationHematopoietic stem cell transplantationAdverse effectSurgeryCyclophosphamideLymphomaChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Thiotepa-based autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) but up to 30-60% of patients are unable to receive ASCT after MATRix induction, frequently due to treatment-related adverse events. Common conditioning regimens such as thiotepa/BCNU or thiotepa/busulfan/cyclophosphamide have also been associated with risks of pulmonary toxicity or increased transplant-related mortality. Novel strategies to improve the utilization and tolerability of ASCT are therefore needed to maximize the curative potential of this therapy in PCNSL. Methods: This retrospective population-based study included all patients diagnosed with large B-cell lymphoma-type PCNSL who were intended for ASCT in the province of Alberta, Canada between 2011 and 2022. Provincial treatment guidelines recommended an abbreviated, low-intensity induction protocol to reduce toxicity and increase transplantation rates (Figure 1B). Step 1 included 2 cycles of rituximab/high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX). Step 2 involved 1 cycle of rituximab/high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. Step 3 consisted of 2 cycles of rituximab/HD-MTX/HDAC and was made optional in July 2018 so that patients with sufficient disease response and performance status following Step 2 could proceed immediately to ASCT. Conditioning consisted of thiotepa 300 mg/m 2 ×2 days and busulfan 3.2mg/kg ×3 days (TT/Bu). Dose reductions of TT/Bu by 10% for every 5 years over the age of 60 were recommended as of May 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Results: The intention-to-transplant (ITT) cohort included 71 patients with median age 58 years (range 26-72), representing 81% of patients aged 18-60 and 55% of those aged 61-72 who were diagnosed with PCNSL in Alberta during the study period. The proportion of patients aged 61-72 who were treated with ITT increased from 42% before 2018 to 70% afterwards. Fifty-six (79%) ITT patients proceeded to ASCT while 15 (21%) did not due to poor performance status (n=6), treatment-related adverse events (n=5), or disease progression (n=4). There was 1 (1%) death due to infection-related non-relapse mortality (NRM) during induction. The routine omission of Step 3 starting in 2018 resulted in high transplantation rates at 29/35 (83%) compared to 27/36 (75%) in the preceding era. With median follow-up time 3.9 years, the 4-year PFS was 69% (95% CI 56-79%) and OS was 80% (95% CI 67-88%) in the ITT cohort (Figure 1A). For the 56 patients who received ASCT, 4-year PFS was 75% (95% CI 57-86%) and OS was 85% (95% CI 68-93%) from the time of ASCT. There was no significant difference in PFS between patients in complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR versus partial response (PR) before ASCT (p=0.86); however, 5 patients with progressive disease before ASCT had inferior PFS compared to those with CR/CRu/PR (4-year PFS 40% vs 82%, p=0.0002). Relapse occurred in 8 (14%) patients at median 373 days (range 54-1411) after ASCT, including 7 with CNS relapse and 1 with systemic relapse. No patient in remission after ASCT received whole brain radiation therapy and most recovered without clinically significant neurologic deficits. There were no deaths due to transplant-related mortality. NRM occurred in 2 (4%) patients due to an unrelated cancer and stroke 1.1 and 4.3 years after ASCT, respectively. Among 27 patients >60 years old treated with ITT, 17 (63%) proceeded to ASCT, including 6 who received dose reductions of TT/Bu. The transplantation rate in this age group increased from 45% to 75% following the routine omission of Step 3. All 17 transplanted patients remain alive and in remission with median follow-up 2.5 years. Conclusion:In this real-world study of 71 patients with PCNSL, an abbreviated, low-intensity induction protocol resulted in high transplantation rates (~80%) and favorable long-term outcomes with 4-year OS 80%. Notably, TT/Bu conditioning achieved a low incidence of relapse with no transplant-related mortality observed, including among patients >60 years old. These data demonstrate that de-escalated induction therapy can result in improved rates of successful ASCT, thereby optimizing the outcomes of PCNSL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,034

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207