MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389232057 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187648

Predictors of Diagnostic Delays and Loss to Follow-up in Women with Von Willebrand Disease

2023· article· en· W4389232057 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jaclyn Shelton, Michelle Millions, Roy Khalifé, Haowei Sun

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Établissements canadiensUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineVon Willebrand diseasePediatricsRetrospective cohort studyEmergency departmentDiseaseObstetricsVon Willebrand factorInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Diagnostic and treatment delays in von Willebrand disease (vWD) disproportionately affect women. Such delays may lead to poor health outcomes from preventable bleeding complications related to menstruation, childbirth, and surgeries. They may also result in increased health resource utilization, including increased emergency department (ED) visits, transfusions, and surgical interventions. Patient and disease-related factors associated with diagnostic delays and loss to follow-up have been poorly documented, but are important to examine particularly in relation to gynecological outcomes. Aims: 1) To examine the prevalence and predictors of diagnostic delays and loss to follow-up in women with vWD. 2) To assess the impact of diagnostic delays on rates of ED visits, red cell transfusions, and hysterectomies. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women ≥18 years with a diagnosis of vWD followed by the Northern Alberta Bleeding Disorders Program. Diagnostic delay was determined from the time of first documented bleeding event to the time of vWD diagnosis, with delayed diagnosis defined as >5 years. All bleeding events on the ISTH-BAT were included in the above definition, except for easy bruising due to its subjectivity and suboptimal documentation. Loss to follow-up was defined as ≥5 years since last hematology visit at the time of data collection. We collected the following patient and disease-related factors: age, rural status, year of diagnosis (pre-2000, 2000-2010, or 2011-2021), vWD type, baseline vWF activity, ISTH-BAT, family history of vWD, abnormal coagulation screen (INR/aPTT) prior to diagnosis, and status-post endometrial ablation or hysterectomy. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of diagnostic delays and loss to follow-up. Research ethics approval was obtained. Results: We included 173 women: 140 (81%) type 1, 23 (13%) type 2, 5 (3%) type 3, and 5 (3%) platelet-type vWD. The median age of diagnosis was 27 years (IQR 18-38). The median time from first bleeding symptom to vWD diagnosis was 12.1 years (IQR 4.6-24.2), with 66 (38%) women presenting with ≥3 bleeding events prior to diagnosis. Further, 71 (41%) presented with ≥1 severe bleeding event (requiring ED visit, hospitalization, red cell transfusion, or surgical hemostasis) prior to diagnosis. Timing from first bleeding symptom to diagnosis was available in 154 (89%) women, of whom 113 (73%) experienced delayed diagnosis. Compared to women with delayed diagnosis, those diagnosed within 5 years of their first bleeding symptom were more likely to have a known family history of vWD (51% vs 26%, P=0.01) or have been diagnosed between 2000-2010 (56% vs 33%, P=0.002). Urban/rural residence, vWD type, baseline vWF activity, blood type, and abnormal coagulation screen were not significantly associated with diagnostic delays (Table 1). Of the 155 patients with available follow-up data, 44 (28%) were lost to follow-up for ≥5 years. Only rural residence (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.9-5.3, P=0.07) trended towards higher odds of loss to follow-up. Age, year of diagnosis, vWD type, baseline vWF activity, ISTH-BAT, and prior hysterectomy/ablation status were not associated with loss to follow-up. Women with diagnostic delays had a significantly higher ISTH-BAT (median 7 vs 5, P=0.005). They also had significantly higher rates of hysterectomies for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB; 20% vs 0%, P=0.0006), as well as a non-significant trend towards higher rates of dilatation and curettage (D&C; 12% vs 2%, P=0.11) and endometrial ablations (12% vs 5%, P=0.36) (Table 2). 17 women underwent surgical procedures for HMB (D&C, endometrial ablation, and/or hysterectomy) prior to their vWD diagnosis. Conclusion: Women with vWD often experience prolonged diagnostic delays. In our study, many women had bleeding symptoms for at least 5 years, and often greater than 10 years, prior to diagnosis. There was also a high rate of loss to follow-up, particularly in rural populations. Delayed diagnosis occurred even in women with a known family history of vWD and in women with severe bleeding events. Alarmingly, the rate of delayed diagnosis increased over time and was associated with higher rates of surgical interventions for HMB. For this reason, a high index of suspicion is paramount to ensure a prompt diagnosis of vWD, as this may prevent severe gynecological bleeding complications and their need for invasive surgical management.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,061

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→Travaux en français237 207→