MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389233288 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-173362

Primary or Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia: Dismal Outcome Despite Modern Treatments

2023· article· en· W4389233288 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Camille Tessier, Richard LeBlanc, Jean Roy, Sabrina Trudel, Julie Cote, Marc Lalancette, Jean‐Samuel Boudreault, Émilie Lemieux‐Blanchard, Rayan Kaedbey, Michel Pavic

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityHôtel-Dieu de QuébecHôpital Charles-Le MoyneUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalConcordia UniversityHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de Sherbrooke
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlasma cell leukemiaMedicineMultiple myelomaPlasma cell dyscrasiaInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)GastroenterologyBortezomibCohortRetrospective cohort studySurgeryImmunologyImmunoglobulin light chainAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia, associated with short survival. This disease is usually divided into primary PCL (pPCL), when occurring de novo, or secondary PCL (sPCL), when a patient previously diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoes leukemic transformation. Because of the very low incidence of PCL, only a few cohorts have been reported and thus, information on this disease is scarce. The goal of this study was to better understand PCL, particularly in regard to the characteristics of MM before leukemic transformation and the outcomes following modern treatments in both pPCL and sPCL. METHODS We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients diagnosed with PCL between January 2005 and December 2020 in eight institutions in the Province of Québec, Canada. Patients were identified through digital medical records. The 2013 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria for PCL (circulating plasma cells ≥ 20% and/or ≥ 2 x 10 9/L) were used to determine eligibility. Patients were excluded if they received treatment for another malignancy after the diagnosis of PCL. RESULTS We identified 99 eligible PCL patients, of whom 33 were pPCL and 66 were sPCL. Among significant clinical characteristics, both pPCL and sPCL patients showed a high frequency of thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, and light chain isotype (Table I). At MM diagnosis, patients who eventually progressed to sPCL were much younger (median 61.8 years) than a typical MM cohort and many of them already demonstrated markers of poor prognosis, including elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), elevated ß 2-microglobulin and complex cytogenetics (Table I). The median time between initial MM diagnosis and leukemic progression was 27.3 months (IQR, 12.7 - 41.6). The median number of lines of treatment prior to transformation was 2 (range 1 - 7). Overall, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT; n = 28) or tandem ASCT-allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT-alloSCT; n = 4) did not result in longer time to PCL progression when compared to those who received chemotherapy alone (31.6 vs 22.9 months, p = 0.164). Median overall survival (OS) for pPCL and sPCL were respectively 18.3 months (95% CI, 0.0 - 39.0) and 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.9 - 1.5) (p < 0.001). When considering survival from MM diagnosis to death, the median OS for sPCL was 30.2 months (95% CI, 24.1 - 36.2). Patients with pPCL who underwent ASCT or tandem ASCT-alloSCT had a significantly longer OS than patients treated with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 - 0.64, p = 0.003). The impact of stem cell transplant on sPCL survival could not be assessed, as only one of 66 sPCL patients received this type of treatment. The median number of lines of treatment was 2 (range 1 - 9) for pPCL and 1 (range 0 - 5) for sPCL. Interestingly, patients receiving more recent regimens (2013-2020) did not have a better OS than patients receiving earlier treatments (2005-2012) (p = 0.391). When analysed separately, OS for pPCL or sPCL did not improve significantly in the later period (Figure 1). Clinical characteristics independently associated with poor outcomes were sPCL subtype and elevated LDH (respectively, HR 4.9, 95% CI 2.2 - 11.9, p < 0.001 and HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0 - 5.7, p = 0.049). Although expression of CD19 and/or CD20 was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis, a trend towards improved survival was observed in patients expressing these markers (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1 - 1.1, p = 0.062). CONCLUSION This retrospective, multicenter study is one of the largest PCL cohorts reported and we are, to our knowledge, the first to investigate characteristics of MM patients before their transformation into sPCL. Although this subgroup is often described as a late-stage complication of heavily pretreated MM, our data suggest that sPCL originates from an already high-risk MM population rather than being the result of long-term selection of an aggressive clone. More information is however needed for early identification of MM patients at risk of PCL transformation. Finally, despite the use of newer chemotherapy regimens, we observed no improvement in OS in recent years, highlighting the urgent need for better treatment options for both pPCL and sPCL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→