Long-Term Treatment with Fostamatinib in Japanese Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: An Open-Label Extension Study Following a Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Fostamatinib, a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults in the US, Canada, Europe, Israel, and Japan. We evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of fostamatinib treatment and the off-therapy platelet count in Japanese patients with primary ITP in a phase 3 clinical trial with a 24-week double-blind period, a 28-week open-label extension period, and a pre-defined washout period. Methods The trial enrolled Japanese patients who had failed to respond or did not tolerate ≥1 prior ITP treatment, who had a mean platelet count <30,000/μL (based on 3 screening and baseline platelet measurements), and had a platelet count at each visit <35,000/μL. Dosing was at 100 mg bid for 4 weeks and then 150 mg bid if needed and tolerated. One concomitant treatment was allowed (corticosteroids, azathioprine or danazol). The dosage of the concomitant treatment was to remain the same during the 24-week double-blind period but could be reduced or discontinued during the open-label period. Efficacy endpoints were platelet response rate (i.e., the percentage of patients who achieved a platelet count of ≥ 50 × 10 3/μL at 2 consecutive visits at least 28 days apart). The platelet count of the responders during the study period were evaluated. Results A total of 33 patients who were either treated with fostamatinib in the 24-week double-blind period (Fostamatinib-Fostamatinib group, n=22) or treated with placebo in the double-blind period and then treated with fostamatinib in the 28-week open-label extension period (Placebo-Fostamatinib group, n=11) were analyzed. Of those, 79% (26/33) were women, the median age was 62, the median baseline platelet count was 19 x 10 3/μL, and 58% (19/33) had two or more previous treatments. The platelet response rate was 36% (8/22) in the Fostamatinib-Fostamatinib group and 27% (3/11) in the Placebo-Fostamatinib group. The platelet count of the responders in the Fostamatinib-Fostamatinib group increased to ≥50 × 10 3/μL shortly after initiating fostamatinib and remained around 100 × 10 3/μL between Week 14 and Week 52, whereas the platelet count of the responders in the Placebo-Fostamatinib group remained low while receiving placebo but increased after receiving fostamatinib ( Figure 1). Among 14 patients with concomitant glucocorticoids treatments at the beginning of the open-label period, 43% (6/14) reduced or discontinued glucocorticoids while receiving fostamatinib without disease relapse. In the washout period of up to 4 weeks, all 12 patients experienced a mild decrease in platelet count, but none developed bleeding events ( Figure 2). Three of four patients who completed the 4-week washout period had a slight increase in platelet counts from Week 2 to Week 4. In the double-blind and open-label periods, adverse events were reported in 96% (21/22) of the Fostamatinib-Fostamatinib group and 100% (11/11) of the Placebo-Fostamatinib group, and treatment-related adverse events in 77% (17/22) and 46% (5/11), respectively. In the washout period, adverse events were reported in 50% (6/12) of patients, and treatment-related adverse events in 0% (0/12). We found no new safety risk or late-onset adverse events specific to Japanese patients. Conclusions The long-term efficacy and safety of fostamatinib were observed in Japanese patients with primary ITP, along with the feasibility of glucocorticoid reduction/discontinuation during fostamatinib treatment, and a lack of bleeding events after abrupt discontinuation of fostamatinib. The findings obtained from this study will help position fostamatinib as a second-line treatment in patients with primary ITP.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».