MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389234664 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-190426

Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Triple Class Exposed Multiple Myeloma: A Population-Based Cohort Study

2023· article· en· W4389234664 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Alissa Visram, Hsien Seow, Gregory R. Pond, Ana Gayowsky, Arleigh McCurdy, Christopher Cipkar, Hyra Sapru, C. Tom Kouroukis, Mohammed A. Aljama, Mohammad Ebraheem, S.R. Foley, Hira Mian

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensJuravinski Cancer CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityOttawa Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePomalidomideDaratumumabLenalidomidePopulationRegimenMultiple myelomaInternal medicineHealth careClinical trialOncology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have improved substantially with access to novel therapeutic agents. However, patients with triple class exposed (TCE) MM continue to have poor outcomes. Though newer bispecific antibody and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapies have improved outcomes of TCE patients, these therapies are inaccessible outside of clinical trials in many publicly funded healthcare systems, including Canada. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns, outcomes, unplanned health care utilization and quality-of-life impairments of TCE MM patients in Ontario, Canada. These data will provide a crucial benchmark to compare to as novel immunotherapies become available. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized data from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (IC/ES) administrative database, which contains all health records of patients treated within Ontario's publicly funded healthcare system. Drug exposure was determined using the Cancer Activity Level Reporting (ALR) and Ontario Drug Benefit Claims Registry (ODB) databases, housed within IC/ES, which contain data on intravenous and oral MM treatment exposure for standard of care and clinical trial regimens. Patients were defined as TCE if they had prior or current treatment with a regimen containing an immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide or pomalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib), and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (isatuximab or daratumumab). The TCE index regimen was identified as the treatment on which a patient was first identified as having met the TCE definition. Inpatient hospitalization visits did not include planned chemotherapy infusion visits. Quality of life was described using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Score with scores ³ 7 corresponding to severe symptoms. Overall survival (OS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of the 16,777 patients with a diagnosis of MM between 2007-2021 in Ontario, 1358 patients were classified as TCE during their treatment course. The TCE index regimen was a daratumumab-based regimen in most patients [daratumumab/velcade/dex (n=566, 42%), daratumumab/lenalidomide/dex (n=619, 46%)]. Of the TCE patients, 247 (18%) were still receiving treatment with the TCE index regimen at last follow up, 263 (19%) died without receiving any additional treatment, and 489 (36%) received a subsequent MM treatment after the TCE index regimen. Baseline characteristics of patients (n=489) treated with a subsequent MM regimen after post TCE are summarized in Table 1. The three most commonly administered therapies post TCE were carfilzomib-dexamethasone (n=111, 23%), pomalidomide-dexamethasone (n=77, 16%) and oral cyclophosphamide (n=49, 10%). The next-line treatment regimen was administered in an academic versus community treatment center in 235 (48%) versus 254 (52%) of patients, respectively. The next-line therapy was a clinical trial in only 37 (8%) patients. Regarding healthcare utilization, among TCE patients receiving subsequent therapy, 149 (30%) were evaluated in the emergency department (ED), 126 (26%) were admitted to hospital, and 48 (10%) were referred to palliative care while on treatment with the subsequent therapy. Among patients with available information, the most common severe patient-reported symptoms during the subsequent line of treatment included: tiredness (27%), pain (23%) and overall poor well-being (21%). Additionally, 35% of patients had a ECOG PS of ≥2 on next-line treatment. The median OS patients treated after the TCE index regimen was 1.05 year (95% CI 0.89-1.35) as shown in Figure 1. Of the patients that died during follow up, the majority died in hospital (n=147, 44%) and were referred to palliative care (217, 65%). Conclusion: In this real-world study, we showed that the overall outcomes of TCE MM patients remains poor in Canada, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapies. Furthermore, we demonstrated that TCE patients receiving subsequent therapy had significant unplanned health care utilization and poor quality of life. Future studies will need to assess whether the outcomes, healthcare utilization, and patient-reported quality of life improve as newer immunotherapies become accessible as standard of care treatments within our publicly funded healthcare system.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,775
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,453

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→