Prognostic Role of Multiparameter Flow Cytometry-Based Measurable Residual Disease Assessment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with FMS3-like Tyrosine Kinase-3 Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3-ITD)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring is predictive in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Assessment of FMS3-like tyrosine kinase-3 in-frame internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) is usually performed at diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Due to its relative lower sensitivity of 2%, FLT3-ITD PCR is not routinely used during response assessment. Next-generation sequencing is similarly limited by technical difficulties in capturing tandem duplications using the short base pair-based sequencing method. Long base pair-based sequencing has been reported, but its use is limited by financial restrictions. Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) can be a useful tool for MRD monitoring in this AML subtype until such time that molecular techniques for detecting FLT3-ITD MRD are optimized. Patients and methods The study evaluated the outcomes of FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients diagnosed and treated from 2018 to 2022 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. We compared outcomes according to MFC-MRD post-induction and FLT3-ITD allele frequency (AF) status at diagnosis. MRD cut-off was 0.1%. Data were locked as of June 30, 2023. Clinical outcomes evaluated include overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated considering competing risk. The Kaplan-Meier method using a log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used for analyses, while the Gray test and Fine-Grey model were used for uni- and multivariate analysis for CIR and NRM. Results A total of 111 patients with a mean age of 63.5 years were included, of whom 90 received treatment. Secondary AML accounted for 12.7% of patients. Risk stratification according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 was favorable in 2 (1.8%), intermediate in 67 (60.4%), and adverse in 42 patients (37.8%). Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) co-mutation was observed in 55 patients (49.5%). Seventy-nine patients (87.8%) could be assessed for overall response, including 69 (76.7%) who achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Of these, 54 achieved first CR/CRi (CR1) with 1 induction cycle. MFC-MRD data were available in 61 patients, of whom 44 (72.1%) were MRD negative, while 17 (27.9%) were MRD positive. With a median follow-up of 437 days, 50 patients (45%) were still alive. Median OS and RFS were 3.42 years and 1.05 years, respectively. Among patients who achieved CR1, post-induction MFC-MRD positivity correlated with an inferior OS (HR 2.35 [1.06-5.26], p=0.037) and a trend for a shorter RFS (HR 2.08 [0.99-4.35], p=0.052). We examined the impact of FLT3-ITD AF at diagnosis on long-term outcomes. By applying a binary recursive partitioning method, the cut-off of FLT3-ITD AF with the best risk stratification power for RFS, was defined at 54.6%. The group with a higher FLT3-ITD AF showed inferior OS (HR 1.86 [1.01-3.44], p=0.047) and RFS (HR 1.91 [1.09-3.33], p=0.023). Taking together FLT3-ITD AF at diagnosis and MFC-MRD status at CR1, patients with low FLT3-ITD AF and negative MRD had the highest OS rate of 86.2% at 12 months (p=0.023), and the highest RFS at 72.4% (p=0.096), while the corresponding values for low FLT3-ITD AF/positive MRD patients were 87.5% and 50%, respectively. In contrast, those with high FLT3-ITD AF/negative MRD had an OS of 72.7% and a RFS of 45.5%, while those with high FLT3-ITD AF/positive MRD showed the lowest OS (16.7%) and the shortest RFS (16.7%). There was no statistical difference in CIR and NRM among groups. Multivariate analysis with stepwise selection was performed, considering age at diagnosis, ELN 2022 risk, MFC-MRD at CR1, FLT3-ITD AF at diagnosis, cytogenetics, and NPM1 co-mutation. Predictive factors for OS were MFC-MRD post-induction (HR 2.49 [1.11-5.61], p=0.027) and FLT3-ITD AF (HR 2.29 [1.03-5.11], p=0.043). For RFS, age at diagnosis (HR 1.03 [1.00-1.06], p=0.038) and FLT3-ITD AF (HR 2.40 [1.15-5.01], p=0.019) were predictive, while MFC-MRD was not significant (HR 1.59 [0.72-3.53], p=0.25). Conclusion Our data demonstrate that MFC-based MRD assessment is feasible in AML with FLT3-ITD. Although better outcomes are expected in patients with a lower FLT3-ITD AF, patients who failed to achieve MRD negativity at CR1 showed inferior outcomes. The presence of both poor risk factors, a high AF of FLT3-ITD at diagnosis and MRD positivity at CR1, correlated with the worst treatment outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».