MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389235308 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187921

CNS Involvement in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis from the Staging, Evaluation and Response Criteria Harmonization (SEARCH) for Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma (CAYAHL) Group

2023· article· en· W4389235308 sur OpenAlexaff
Reena Pabari, Kathleen M. McCarten, Jamie E. Flerlage, Hollie Lai, Christine Mauz-Koerholz, Karin Dieckmann, Monica Palese, Sue Caste, Sharon M. Castellino, Kara M. Kelly, Dietrich Stoevesandt, Lars Kurch

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLymphomaRetrospective cohort studyClinical trialCancerYoung adultRadiologyPediatricsOncologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) accounts for approximately 7% of childhood cancer, most frequent in adolescents and young adults. In contrast to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), central nervous system (CNS) involvement at the time of diagnosis with HL is rare and poorly understood. Information regarding the clinical presentation, management, response to treatment and outcome of patients who exhibit this finding is limited to case reports or small series. We sought to describe CNS involvement at the time of diagnosis with pediatric HL by performing a retrospective analysis of 3 large international clinical trials. Methods Patients with CNS involvement were identified from the imaging databases of the COG trial AHOD1331 (NCT02166463) and EuroNet trials PHL-C1 (NCT00433459, EudraCT 2006-000995-33) and PHL-C2 (NCT02684708, EudraCT 2012-004053-88). Imaging was reviewed collaboratively by COG and Euronet radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians with expertise in HL, with input from radiation oncologists and pediatric oncologists. All identified cases of CNS involvement had morphologic (CT) and metabolic (FDG-PET) imaging prior to initiation of therapy, as well as disease response assessment after 2 cycles of therapy. Variables evaluated included: age, sex, Ann Arbor stage, histology, symptoms at the time of presentation (pain, neurologic symptoms), corticosteroid administration prior to FDG-PET scan, number and location of CNS lesions, tissue of origin of the CNS lesion, anatomic description of the involvement of the CNS lesion, number and location of E-lesions, whether emergency irradiation or an operative procedure were performed at diagnosis, FDG tracer uptake at the time of initial staging, response of the CNS lesions after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, whether relapse occurred and in which location. CNS involvement was defined in 2 ways: (1) lesions originating within the CNS parenchyma and (2) lesions extending into the CNS. Results 45 patients with 55 CNS lesions were identified from a combined cohort of 5569 patients with a new diagnosis of HL. 9 patients presented with pain and 4 with neurologic symptoms, however information regarding clinical symptoms was not available for 34/45 patients. Symptoms corresponded to the location of the CNS lesion. All identified lesions extended into the CNS from surrounding tissue, none originated within the CNS parenchyma. 82.2% of patients had a single lesion extending into the CNS, most commonly through the neural foramina into the thoracic spine (45.5%), sacrum (23.6%) or lumbar spine (21.8%). Lesions originated from adjacent bone (45%) or soft tissue (40%). 89% of patients with CNS lesions had stage IV HL, and 68.8% had extranodal (non-CNS) disease. 54.8% of lesions displaced the spinal cord, but none infiltrated the spinal cord itself. After 2 cycles of chemotherapy, 67.3% of CNS lesions had a >75% reduction in size or complete resolution, and 32.7% of CNS lesions decreased in volume by 50-75%. A residual mass was present for 74% of lesions involving the neural foramina after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. 89.1% of lesions were PET negative at interim response assessment (IRA). 2 CNS lesions were associated with relapse at the CNS site, these were PET negative at IRA. 13 lesions received irradiation, none of these were sites of subsequent relapse. Conclusions This large, combined cohort of intermediate- and high-risk pediatric patients enrolled on clinical trials from 2007 to 2021 confirms the rarity of CNS involvement at the time of diagnosis with HL, with an overall incidence of 0.8%. Importantly, CNS lesions extended from adjacent tissue and did not originate within the CNS itself. These lesions never directly infiltrated the brain parenchyma or spinal cord. They were highly metabolically active at diagnosis, and demonstrated an excellent metabolic and morphologic response to the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with CNS involvement had a 2-fold greater incidence of extranodal disease than previously reported cohorts. In summary, this retrospective study provides key information about CNS involvement in pediatric HL at the time of diagnosis, contributing to our understanding of this rare, yet important, clinical presentation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207