Abstract B011: Dynamics of predicted tumor neoepitope burden in a pan-cancer solid tumor pediatric cohort
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) binding of tumor neoepitopes confers clinical value in certain adult malignancies. However, the prevalence of tumors that result in HLA binding of neoepitopes in pediatric malignancies is not as well-characterized. We set out to establish the feasibility of predicting neoepitope burden and the prevalence of predicted neoepitope across a previously established cohort of pediatric oncology patients. Additionally, because this analysis requires knowledge of each patient’s HLA haplotype for predicting binding of tumor peptides, we also set out to develop a novel algorithm to profile HLA haplotypes within the context of a larger whole genome (WGS) and RNAseq analysis pipeline. Finally, in this high-risk pediatric oncology cohort, we sought to determine the dynamics of predicted neoepitope burden at multiple time points in disease progression, including relapsed/refractory disease and metastatic disease. A previously established cohort of 147 high-risk pediatric oncology patients, including solid tumors CNS tumors, and leukemias/lymphomas was used for this analysis. This comprised patients with relapsed/refractory disease (66), and rare diagnoses (14). For these 147 patients, tumor/normal WGS (tumor ~60X; germline ~30X), as well as tumor RNAseq (polyA selected, ≥20 million reads) was performed. In addition to the initial timepoints, additional tumor samples were profiled for 27 patients, resulting in 179 total samples. A special focus on longitudinal analysis is devoted to osteosarcoma patients (12 with multiple timepoints). WGS and RNAseq were analyzed using a previously established pipeline. Somatic variants (SNVs), mutational burden, structural rearrangements (SVs), mutational signatures, and copy-number alterations (CNAs) were identified using WGS. As part of this new analysis, HLA class I haplotypes were identified from WGS integrated with RNAseq expression. Putative neoepitopes were predicted from expressed protein altering somatic variants using MHCFlurry. Importantly, HLA and neoepitope analysis was able to use intermediate data from the existing WGS/RNAseq analysis pipeline, resulting in significantly faster turnaround times. Our results demonstrate that our algorithm for determining HLA haplotypes by sampling already-mapped WGS and RNASeq performs with comparable accuracy to similar previously published methods that rely on unmapped data. In terms of predicted of tumor neoepitope burden, of the 171 samples with at least one protein altering variant, 166 are predicted to have at least one bound neoantigen (median=6). Of these, 133 samples are predicted to have at least one bound neoantigen that is clonal and expressed in RNA (median=3). Further characterization of the neoepitope burden of these tumors and the evolution of predicted neoepitope burden across multiple time points will be shared at the meeting. Citation Format: Charles W Macaulay, Marcus R Breese, E. Alejandro Sweet-Cordero. Dynamics of predicted tumor neoepitope burden in a pan-cancer solid tumor pediatric cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2023 Oct 1-4; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2023;11(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B011.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».