MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389243690 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-173700

Heterotopic Ossification in Hemophilia: A Multi-Center Case Series

2023· article· en· W4389243690 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Bruno Steiner, Mark A. Krimmel, Eric Y. Chang, Merel A. Timmer, Grace Hernandez, Jeffrey Kallberg, Osman Khan, Lorene Schmaderer, Fred Loeffler, Stacie Akins, Tiffany Kaltenmark, Stacey Cave, Jessica Ovans, Rebecca Kruse‐Jarres

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHeterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
Établissements canadiensSt. Paul's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHemarthrosisMedicineHeterotopic ossificationMyositis ossificansHematomaComplicationSoft tissueSurgeryIncidence (geometry)Physical therapyRadiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

CONCLUSION Heterotopic Ossification (HO), or Myositis Ossificans Traumatica, is the post-traumatic formation of unwanted abnormal benign lamellar ectopic bone within extra skeletal tissue locations. HO can form in varying sizes and sites in the body and can significantly impair muscle performance, range of motion (ROM), and function. Since the recent adoption of diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) in hemophilia care, providers and physical therapists have deepened their understanding of hemarthropathic and hemarthrosis progression. MSKUS has also aided in detecting soft tissue injuries, muscle hematoma, and resultant HO formation. Despite advances in therapies for hemophilia, HO is emerging as an unforeseen complication of contusion and injury-related muscle bleeding in hemophilia. Its detection is important as delayed or inappropriate rehabilitation may prolong recovery and disability time. This multicenter retrospective case series sought to verify and confirm HO detection and investigate whether specific types and severities of hemophilia are at increased risk of HO. Deidentified data and MSKUS images from 29 cases were collected from 9 Hemophilia Treatment Centers from the USA, the Netherlands, and Canada from 2016 to June 2023. The case series was declared exempt from IRB approval. Diagnostic and evaluative data was compiled in Redcap. Images were reviewed and diagnostically confirmed by an RMSK-certified Doctor of Physical Therapy and a Radiologist. A single clinic subset was compared to the national hemophilia incidence taken from the ATHN dataset 2022. We detected HO formation in 29 patients across 9 HTCs. Trauma-induced HO was observed in all bleeding disorder types and severities. (See Table 1). The patients' ages at the time of the inciting injury ranged from 7-56 years, with a mean age of 22.3 and a median of 16.The study's highest incidence of HO cases occurred in patients with type A hemophilia totaling 22/29 subjects or 74.8% of all cases. Except for one severe A, one severe B and a moderate B, the patients were not on prophylactic hemostatic management at the time of injury. The majority of HO (n=24, 82.8%) occurred in the anterior and lateral compartments of the thigh and hip. There were 5 incidents in the upper extremity (4 in the upper anterior arm, 1 in the hand). 24 cases were due to blunt trauma except for 4 in the psoas at the level of the anterior hip and 1 in the elbow flexors of the upper arm. HO formation was mostly associated with deep muscle bleeds next to the bony cortex (n=24). HO was detected on average at 22.97 days after injury (median 21, range 11 to 60), with most detected with MSKUS (n=24) by the physical therapist (n=22) and physician (n=2) in clinic. At the Washington Center for Bleeding Disorders (WACBD), where strict MSKUS follow-up was possible in 7 patients, HO induction was confirmed at day 23, 26, 18, 11, 14, 20, and 22 for a mean of 19.14 days (SD = 5.24). Our study shows that HO occurs regularly in Hemophilia despite its omission in the recently revised 2020 World Federation of Hemophilia guidelines. Notably, the severity or type did not appear to be the sole determinant of HO formation, as the combined total of mild and moderate hemophilia genotypes was 21 (72.4%). Conversely, though limited by the study's small sample size, 74.8% of the HO incidence was reported in type A hemophilia, which appears to be an overrepresentation when compared to the ATHN dataset 2022 report, which indicates an overall 45.59% type A hemophilia incidence. The increased detection of HO in hemophilia may be explained by the growing use of MSKUS by HTC physicians and physical therapists. MSKUS has the advantages of safety and earlier HO detection than radiography. As shown in Fig. 1, HO bears the sonographic signature of hyperechoic contours and deeper acoustic shadowing. The WACBD conducted a review yielding an HO incidence of 23.68% (9 of 38 contusion events) compared to 9-17% in the non-hemophilia population. Though the single-center report is of limited significance, the suggestion of increased HO risk to hemophilia patients merits further study. This case series acknowledges HO as a complication of deep contusions in people with bleeding disorders, especially those not on hemostatic prophylaxis. Further study is needed to determine HO's incidence and risk in Hemophilia. Hemophilia treatment guidelines must be revised to include this complication.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,119
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,733

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHeterotopic Ossification and Related ConditionsTravaux en français237 207