MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389244147 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-189950

Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposition Disease - a Review of Current and Emerging Data

2023· review· en· W4389244147 sur OpenAlexaff
Shreyash Dalmia, Eric Asgari, Kyobin Hwang, Mohammed A. Aljama

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Établissements canadiensJuravinski Cancer CentreMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTransplantationGuidelineAutologous stem-cell transplantationImmunosuppressionDiseaseInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) is a rare complication of abnormal B and plasma cells, characterized by non-fibrillar, Congo-red negative deposits of monoclonal immunoglobulin molecules. These include light chain (LCDD), heavy chain (HCDD), or combined (LHCDD), and can involve several organs, most notably the kidney. Clone directed treatments for MIDD, including chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), are used to reduce abnormal immunoglobulin deposition and restore organ function. Organ transplantation is considered in select cases. However, data is limited in terms of prognosis, association of MIDD with other hematological disorders, and outcomes in the evolving treatment landscape. Objectives The primary aim of this scoping review is to identify and collate existing data on clinical manifestations, disease associations, and treatment options in MIDD. This will help provide evidence-based recommendations and inform future research. Methods We conducted a literature search through EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL. Identified studies were imported onto Covidence and screened by two independent reviewers. Primary studies of patients with MIDD were included. Conference abstracts and dissertations were included if they synthesized data on MIDD. Case reports, reviews, and guideline reports were excluded. Outcomes of interest include disease type, risk factors, systemic manifestations, natural history, and prognosis. Data was also collected on disease association, intervention (observation, immunosuppression, chemotherapy, ASCT, organ transplantation, novel agents), and prognostic variables. Standardized scoping review methodology and PRISMA guidelines were used for protocol development. Results A total of 16,673 records were identified through literature search, of which 125 were used. Most studies were case series, with larger retrospective cohort studies providing data on treatment options and transplantation in MIDD. Grey literature search was also performed and yielded no additional results. LCDD was identified as the most common MIDD subtype. Organ involvement was most commonly renal, followed by hepatic and cardiac. Study endpoints included overall survival, renal survival (i.e., time to initiation of renal replacement therapy), hematologic response, and organ response. Biochemical parameters such as serum creatinine and proteinuria were measured. Single organ involvement was more common than multi-organ, and disease response was primarily assessed using laboratory parameters. There was substantial heterogeneity in treatment. These included corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and chemotherapy - typically bortezomib-containing regimens - followed by ASCT in eligible patients. Renal response rates of up to 79% (n=28) were noted in a larger patient cohort. Patients who demonstrated renal response fared better than non-renal responders did (overall survival of 87% vs 60% at 27.3 months, n=255). In patients who underwent ASCT (either as consolidation or in the case of relapse/progression), most patients achieved hematologic CR (71%, n=14). ASCT was relatively well-tolerated, with early transplant-related mortality limited to one patient across 9 studies with data on ASCT (n=69). Patients appeared to have more favorable outcomes with MIDD/MGRS compared to MIDD in the setting of myeloma (VGPR/CR 58.9% vs 47.9%, n=255). Renal response appeared to correlate with deeper hematologic responses. Post renal transplant allograft loss has been noted upon MIDD relapse. Discussion Limited data exists on MIDD and its subtypes. Potential reasons include newer classification schema, low incidence, disease heterogeneity, need for histopathologic diagnosis, and frequently asymptomatic initial course. This scoping review outlines patient characteristics, disease subtypes, and outcomes with treatment options including ASCT and organ transplantation. MIDD appears to respond to chemotherapy and ASCT; however, responses depend on the subtype, associated disease process, and degree of organ involvement. Renal response may have significant prognostic implications. Limitations of this review include a paucity of prospective data, lack of studies using novel plasma cell-directed therapies, and small sample sizes. Further data analysis is ongoing, and emerging prospective data is of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,003
Bibliométrie0,0300,029
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,073
Tête enseignante GPT0,385
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesTravaux en français237 207