Safety and Efficacy of Axatilimab at 3 Different Doses in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (AGAVE-201)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is an immune-mediated complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) that affects multiple organs with inflammatory and fibrotic pathology, leading to significant patient burden and mortality. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R)-dependent monocytes and macrophages play a key role in cGVHD inflammation and fibrosis. Axatilimab (SNDX-6352) is an investigational, high-affinity anti-CSF-1R monoclonal antibody that targets monocytes and macrophages. We previously demonstrated the biological and clinical activity of axatilimab with organ-specific responses and symptom improvement in a phase 1/2 study (NCT03604692) in patients with cGVHD. Methods: This pivotal phase 2, open-label, randomized, multicenter study evaluated axatilimab at 3 different doses in alloHCT patients with recurrent or refractory cGVHD (AGAVE-201; NCT04710576). Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive intravenous (IV) axatilimab at 0.3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 1 mg/kg Q2W, or 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W). Randomization was stratified by severity of cGVHD and prior use of ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, or belumosudil. Concomitant use of corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus or everolimus) was allowed. Axatilimab treatment could be continued as long as there was clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the first 6 cycles (24 weeks) as defined by the NIH 2014 consensus criteria; the efficacy boundary of the ORR is based on the lower bound of the 95% CI exceeding 30%. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients reporting a clinically significant reduction of symptoms, as measured by the modified Lee Symptom Scale (mLSS) score with a threshold of ≥7 points. Safety endpoints included frequency and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: A total of 241 patients were enrolled across 121 study sites and 239 (99.2%) patients were treated with axatilimab at the data cutoff of 7 April 2023. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy, including ruxolitinib (74%), belumosudil (23%), and ibrutinib (31%). Demographics and disease characteristics were balanced among the 3 dose cohorts (Table 1). ORR (95% CI) was 74% (63, 83) with 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 67% (55, 77) with 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 50% (39, 61) with 3 mg/kg Q4W (Table 1). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached in any of the cohorts, with 60%, 60% and 53% of patients maintaining response at 12 months in the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 3 mg/kg Q4W dose cohorts, respectively. Clinical benefit, as measured by reduction in mLSS score, was reported in 55%, 54%, and 36% of patients in the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 3 mg/kg Q4W cohorts, respectively, in the first 6 cycles. Drug discontinuation owing to TEAEs occurred in 6% of patients with 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 22% with 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 18% with 3 mg/kg Q4W. The most common TEAEs are summarized in Table 2. Fatal TEAEs occurred in 1.3%, 8.6%, and 7.6% of patients in the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 3 mg/kg Q4W dose cohorts, respectively. The frequency of TRAEs and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were dose dependent, consistent with CSF-1R inhibition-mediated macrophage clearance. Most infections were mild, with 3 reported cytomegalovirus infections, including reactivations, in the higher dose cohorts. Conclusions: The AGAVE-201 pivotal trial met its primary endpoint for all doses studied. Axatilimabtreatment of refractory cGVHD in heavily pretreated patients resulted in robust clinical activity and durable responses in all 3 dose cohorts, with the highest ORR and least toxicity at the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W dose. Adverse events consisted primarily of transient laboratory abnormalities and other on-target effects known to be associated with CSF-1R block.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».