Clinical, Cytogenetic and Immunophenotypic Spectra of Post-Transplant Relapse Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative therapy used to treat myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Relapse post-HCT confers poor outcomes and subsequent therapy is not standardized. Like acute myeloid leukemia (AML), several mechanisms are known to be involved in post-HCT relapse including clonal evolution in favor of chemotherapy-resistant clones and tumor immune escape. Systemic reviews are scarce in the MDS post-HCT relapse population. Accordingly, the present study aimed to investigate clinical, cytogenetic, and immunophenotypic (IP) spectra for MDS post-HCT relapse patients (pts), along with subsequent therapies, and clinical outcomes following post-HCT relapse. Patients and methods A retrospective study was conducted and found that 231 MDS pts received HCT between April 2010 and September 2022 at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) following post-HCT relapse. Secondary endpoints explored time to relapse (TTR), relapse presentation (i.e., MDS or AML), clonal evolution (i.e., changes in cytogenetics or IP profiles), and therapeutic strategies delivered after relapse. Results Of the 231 MDS pts treated with HCT, 52 (23%) relapsed in a median of 4.5 months (range 0.9-59.8 months). Twenty-five (48%) pts relapsed with MDS (i.e., blast <20%), while 27 (52%) relapsed with AML (i.e., blast ≥20%) in the marrow. Fifteen (65%) pts showed cytogenetic changes at the time of post-HCT relapse. Eleven (48%) of which presented with more aggressive findings (i.e., additional structural abnormalities and monosomal karyotype). Ten of 17 (59%) pts presented with changes in their IP profile at post-HCT relapse, 7 (70%) of which relapsed with AML. Combined these findings give evidence of clonal evolution in favor of more aggressive malignant clones that are often responsible for post-HCT relapse. Treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMA) alone or in combination after post-HCT relapse increased OS to 5.6 months in comparison to those not receiving HMA of whom OS was 1.4 months (p=0.0003). Stratified by disease presentation cytogenetic clonal evolution was seen in 6/12 (50%) of the post-HCT MDS relapses, and 9/11 (82%) of the post-HCT AML relapses. Cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and post-HCT relapse, respectively included in descending order: structural abnormalities (n=14/23, 61%; n=20/23, 87%), complex karyotype (n=12/23, 52%; 17/23, 74%), -5/del(5q) (n=11/23, 48%; n=10/23, 43%), -7/del(7q) (n=8/23, 35%; n=11/23, 48%), monosomy karyotype (n=8/23, 35%; n=11/23, 48%), -17 (n=3/23, 13%; n=5/23, 22%), der(5)/t(5;17) (n=2/23, 9%; n=5/23, 22%), -20 (n=2/23, 9%; n=3/23, 13%), and inv(3) (n=1/23, 4%, n=2/23, 9%). Seventeen pts had paired IP profiles available both prior to HCT and at post-HCT relapse, of which 10 (59%) had profile changes of at least 1 antigen. Seven of 10 (70%) pts that relapsed with AML post-HCT had IP expression changes, compared to 3/7 (42.9%) pts that relapsed with MDS post-HCT. Summarized IP findings include reduced expression of CD7 (n=2/6, 33%), altered expression of CD34 (n=3/15, 20%), altered expression of CD117 (n=3/14, 21%), and reduced expression of HLA DR (n=4/15, 27%). The presence of IP expression changes at post-HCT relapse suggests evidence of clonal evolution or immune escape as the mechanism behind the relapsed disease. Overall survival duration was 3.97 months; the 12-month OS rate was 20.0% (10.0-32.5%). Post-HCT relapse treatments included hypomethylating agents (HMA; n=13/46, 28%), HMA with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; n= 7/46, 15%), HMA with Venetoclax (VEN; n=7/46, 15%), chemotherapy (n=9/46, 19%), best supportive care (8/46, 17%) and second HCT (n=2/46, 4%). Patients that received HMA with or without DLI or VEN had a longer survival duration of 5.6 months (95% CI [3.4-13.2 months]) compared to those not receiving HMA 1.4 months (95% CI [0.6-0.39 months, p=0.0003]). The 12-month survival rate was also significantly in favor of pts that received HMA following post-HCT relapse (35.3% [95% CI 17.2-54.0%] vs 4.3% [95% CI 0.3-18.0%]). Conclusion Patients with MDS undergoing HCT may relapse with either MDS or AML. The relapsed disease often shows evidence of clonal evolution in its immunophenotype and/or cytogenetic profile toward a more aggressive disease. Approaches to post-HCT relapse remain heterogenous but HMA is beneficial.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».