MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389247523 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-174338

Disease Characteristics and Outcomes of 504 Young Patients Diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Modern Therapies in Canada

2023· article· en· W4389247523 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Mégane Tanguay, Jean Roy, Jiandong Su, Engin Gul, Donna Reece, Christopher P. Venner, Darrell White, Michael P. Chu, Víctor H. Jiménez‐Zepeda, Kevin Song, Arleigh McCurdy, Hira Mian, Michaël Sébag, Debra Bergstrom, Julie Stakiw, Tony Reiman, Rami Kotb, Muhammad Aslam, Rayan Kaedbey, Martha Louzada, Richard LeBlanc

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensJewish General HospitalMemorial University of NewfoundlandConcordia UniversityMcGill UniversityJuravinski Cancer CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreVancouver General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaDalhousie UniversityCancerCare ManitobaOttawa HospitalSaint John Regional HospitalBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of AlbertaQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCelgeneGilead SciencesAmgen
Mots-clésMedicineMultiple myelomaYoung adultInternal medicineDiseasePediatricsRetrospective cohort studySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background:Multiple myeloma (MM) mostly affects older adults. Although representing around 10% of all cases, patients ≤ 50 years old suffer from the highest number of years lost due to their disease. MM in young patients occurs during their most productive years of life, resulting in a significantly higher personal, familial, professional, and economic burden. Young MM patients are currently underrepresented in clinical trials due to small numbers overshadowed in cohorts of older patients. Their disease characteristics and outcomes following modern treatments remain poorly understood (Tanguay M et al., Current Oncol 2023). The purpose of this study is to report disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of young MM patients treated in Canada. Methods:This is a retrospective study using the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database, which is a repository of real-world patient data reflecting 17 of the major MM academic centers across Canada. All patients 18-50 years old with newly diagnosed MM between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2022 were included. High-risk (HR) cytogenetics were defined as either del17p, t(4;14) or t(14;16). Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results:Among the 6,604 patients newly diagnosed with MM during the study period, 504 (7.6%) were aged between 18-50 years, and included in this analysis. Within this young group, 87 (17.3%) were 18-40 years old and 417 (82.7%) were between 41-50 years. MM was diagnosed in 301 (59.7%) patients between 2010 to 2015, and in 203 (40.3%) patients between 2016 to 2022. The median age at diagnosis was 45.9 years (range 25.6 to 50). Male patients represented 57.7% of the cohort. IgG was the most common isotype in 251 (49.8%) cases, while 115 (22.8%) patients had light chain disease. In 375 patients with available data, 16% were R-ISS 1, 73.1% R-ISS 2, and 10.9% R-ISS 3. Lytic lesions, elevated creatinine, anemia, hypercalcemia, and high LDH were respectively present in 46.8%, 15.5%, 44%, 18.8%, and 18.7% of patients. HR cytogenetics were present in 23.7% of patients, with del17p in 11.5%, t(4;14) in 14.9%, and t(14;16) in 5.1%; while 1q+ and del1p were detected in 27.9% and 15.3%, respectively. Twelve (2.4%) patients were diagnosed with plasma cell leukemia. First-line treatment was proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based in 462 (91.7 %) and immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent-based in 7 (1.4 %); 18 (3.6%) received both a PI and an IMiD and 17 (3.4%) were treated with other modalities. Among all patients, 453 (89.9%) underwent autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) during their disease course. Some patients did not receive ASCT for the following reasons: early death before ASCT in 10 (2%) cases, lost to follow-up prior to ASCT in 13 (2.6%) cases, deemed ineligible for ASCT or patient declined in 24 (4.8%) cases, and participation in a clinical trial not involving ASCT in 1 (0.2%) case. Out of the entire cohort, allogeneic-SCT (allo-SCT) was performed in only 11 patients (2.2%), including 3 (0.6%) who received allo-SCT alone without ASCT. Among patients who received maintenance post ASCT, 93.6% were treated with a lenalidomide-based regimen. Median duration of the different maintenance treatments was 21.2 months. With a median follow-up of 51.9 months (range 0.9 to 154), median PFS (progression-free survival) was 55.4 months (95% CI 49.1-70.2), while median OS (overall survival) was not reached. The 5-year OS and PFS were 78% (95% CI 74-82) and 48% (95% CI 43-53), respectively, whereas the 10-year OS and PFS were 64% (95% CI 58-71) and 28% (95% CI 22-35), respectively (Figure 1a). Median PFS for patients with any HR cytogenetics was 37.9 months (95% CI 29.6-62.8) vs 64.5 months (95% CI 50.6-80.7) for patients with standard-risk cytogenetics (p=0.004) (Figure 1b). We observed no difference in disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes after comparing cohorts aged 18-40 years old vs 41-50 years old. Conclusions: This is among the largest real-world cohorts of young MM patients ≤ 50 years old treated with modern therapies ever reported. Most patients were R-ISS 2 (73.1%), 23.7% had known HR cytogenetics, and the majority (91.7%) received a PI-based first-line treatment. Outcomes of specific subgroups are under analysis and will be presented. Although the OS was not yet reached in this young population, the median PFS of only 55.4 months highlights the urgent need to develop more effective treatments to induce deeper and more durable responses.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,146

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→