Art-based supervision for early professional art therapists
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Early professional art therapists experience unique challenges related to professional identity development. Due to the small size of the art therapy profession, many art therapists experience isolation and role ambiguity as the lone representatives of the art therapy field within the workplace. Following graduation, early professional art therapists encounter competitive job markets, potential misconceptions about art therapy by employers or colleagues, financial stressors, and potential for experiences of vicarious trauma and burnout. Supervision is essential for promoting ethical and effective therapeutic practice and serves as a valuable resource to navigate the challenges experienced during this critical transitional time for post-graduate early professional art therapists. Art-based supervision (ABS) fosters direct engagement in artistic processes, the "tools of the trade" in the art therapy profession, to promote supervisee reflexivity, opportunities for coping and processing of vicarious trauma and compassion fatigue, self-disclosure, and processing of countertransference. To date, few studies have examined the lived experiences and perspectives of early professional art therapists within ABS. To expand the understanding of early professional art therapists' lived experiences of ABS this multimethod study, including constructivist grounded theory and art-based research, was conducted to develop a theory of art-based supervision grounded in the experiences of early professional art therapy supervisees and art therapy supervisors. Two research questions guided the development of a theoretical framework of ABS for early professional art therapists: 1) What are the processes and conditions of ABS as experienced by early professional art therapy supervisees and supervisors? and 2) What are the perceived benefits and challenges of ABS as described by early professional art therapy supervisees and supervisors? Twenty participants including early professional art therapists (n=10) and art therapy supervisors participated in this study. All participants were cisgender women; primarily white (n = 19) with one participant identifying with more than one racial identity (n = 1). At the time of the study, participants were living across the United States and internationally (Australia, Canada, Spain, and Israel). Concurrent data collection and analysis methods were used for this study including initial, focused, and theoretical coding phases; art-based research methods as a data source and method of analysis; memoing; and constant comparative methods. Five core categories were developed from the data to form a theoretical framework of ABS for early professional art therapists. Through the Listening with Art ABR method developed for this study, artwork was created to aesthetically represent and synthesize the relationships between the core categories of the theoretical framework. The findings of this study highlight unique qualities of ABS during the early professional phase of development for art therapists, including the developmental trajectories of early professionals and art therapy supervisors, the dynamics of supervisory relationships, the navigation of boundaries and self-disclosure, the settings and conditions of ABS, and ABS processes. The findings of the theoretical framework contribute to an understanding of ABS during the early professional phase of development for art therapists, with implications for the field of art therapy and art-based supervision within other allied mental health professions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».