MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389248091 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-179316

Caplacizumab Frontline Added to Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Immunosuppression Prevents Unfavorable Outcomes in Immune-Mediated TTP: An International Real-World Study of the TTP-IWG (The Capla 500 Project)

2023· article· en· W4389248091 sur OpenAlexaff
Paul Coppo, Michaël Bubenheim, Y. Benhamou, Linus A. Voelker, Paul T. Brinkkoetter, Lucas Kühne, Paul Knoebl, María Eva Mingot‐Castellano, Maria Cristina Pascual Izquierdo, Javier de la Rubia, Julio del Río-Garma, Shruti Chaturvedi, Camila Masias, Marshall Mazepa, X. Long Zheng, György Sinkovits, Marienn Réti, Christopher J. Patriquin, Katerina Pavenski, T Boechat, João Samuel de Holanda Farias, Eduardo Flávio Oliveira Ribeiro, Michaela Larissa Lobo de Andrade, Agnès Veyradier, Bérangère S. Joly, Raïda Bouzid, Kazuya Sakai, Masanori Matsumoto, Ilaria Mancini, Pasquale Agosti, Flora Peyvandi, Matthew Stubbs, Amjad Hmaid, Sobia Sharif, Tina Dutt, Spero R. Cataland, Bernhard Lämmle, Marie Scully

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRituximabADAMTS13ImmunosuppressionInternal medicineRegimenSalvage therapyThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraGastroenterologyImmunologyPlateletChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) results from autoantibody-mediated severe deficiency of ADAMTS13, the Von Willebrand factor (VWF)-cleaving protease. In this context, ultra-large VWF multimers accumulate in the circulation, leading to increased platelet clumping, with subsequent severe thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and multiorgan failure. The anti-VWF nanobody caplacizumab is licensed for adults with iTTP. Prospective controlled trials and national real-world studies have provided evidence that caplacizumab improved outcome of the acute phase of the disease. However, whether caplacizumab decreases mortality, and the optimal timing of caplacizumab initiation, remain to be determined. To address these questions, an international survey, the Capla 500+ project, has been conducted. An academic call for observations involving experienced teams from 10 worldwide countries recruited 942 adult patients treated with a regimen of daily therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), caplacizumab and immunosuppression with corticosteroids ± rituximab (caplacizumab group). Cases were compared to historic controls (control group) randomly selected from 2015 to 2018 by 4 teams in a 2:1 ratio (N=495), treated with TPE and immunosuppression. Primary outcome was 3-month survival post-first TPE. Key secondary outcomes were refractoriness and exacerbations, time to clinical response, number of TPE to achieve clinical response, time to ADAMTS13 activity recovery ≥20%, and caplacizumab-related adverse events. Clinical presentation and severity were comparable between groups ( Table). All patients received TPE in both caplacizumab and control groups, in association with corticosteroids (99% and 93%, respectively), and rituximab (92% and 71%, respectively) frontline or as salvage therapy. Caplacizumab was started within 3 days (715 patients), or delayed by≥4 days from first TPE (218 patients); for those with delayed initiation, caplacizumab was added for management of exacerbation or refractoriness (63 cases) or a slow improvement to TPE/immunosuppression (155 cases). The 3-month survival post-first TPE in the caplacizumab group was 98.6% vs 93.3% in the control group (p<0.0001). Failure to achieve clinical response was 5-times less likely in the caplacizumab group as compared to the control group (95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.37, p<0.0001). Deaths in the caplacizumab group occurred after a median of 4.5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 3-5), mostly due to uncontrolled iTTP. Patients receiving caplacizumab experienced less refractoriness and exacerbations, and required less TPE to achieve clinical remission than controls (p<0.0001 for all), regardless of the use of rituximab. Forty-six patients experienced an exacerbation following caplacizumab interruption while ADAMTS13 activity was still undetectable. Time to ADAMTS13 activity ≥20% was shorter in the caplacizumab group (p=0.01) ( Table), where rituximab was more systematically used. In patients with delayed caplacizumab initiation, clinical response was obtained after a median of 4 days (IQR, 2-8) following caplacizumab introduction. This result was comparable to the time to clinical response obtained in patients who initiated caplacizumab within 3 days of the first TPE (median, 4 days [IQR, 3-6], p=0.8). In patients with early caplacizumab initiation, unfavorable outcomes were particularly infrequent (death, 1%; refractoriness, 1.1%; exacerbations, 5.3%),andtime to clinical response in survivors was half the time compared to control group survivors (p<0.0001) ( Figure). Caplacizumab-related adverse events occurred in 220 patients (23%). They consisted of major bleeding (N=19, 2.2%), including: digestive tract bleeding (N=8), intracranial hemorrhage, severe central venous catheter insertion bleeding, metrorrhagia (N=2 cases each). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding (N=34, 3.7%), non-clinically relevant non-major bleeding (N=114, 14%), and inflammatory reaction at the injection site (N=35, 4.5%) were also reported. This unprecedented, international academic effort on such a rare disease provides convincing evidence that caplacizumab added to TPE and immunosuppression prevents unfavorable outcomes during the acute phase of iTTP, including mortality, and alleviates the burden of care at the potential expense of rare, major bleeding events.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,092
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,559

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207