Risk-Adjusted Therapies Yield Equivalent Outcomes for Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) Treated for Newly Diagnosed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) on Children's Oncology Group (COG) Studies AALL0434 and AALL1231
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Previous clinical trials have reported that adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients treated for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) have lower disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and increased toxicity as compared to younger patients. Results for the AYA cohort treated on two COG international phase 3 trials for T-ALL are reported here. Patients and Methods AALL0434 enrolled 1562 T-ALL patients (2007-2014) and AALL1231 enrolled 615 T-ALL patients (2014-2019) treated on augmented BFM (ABFM) regimens. AYA patients were defined as age ≥16 years of age (AALL0434: n=226; AALL1231: n = 107). Both studies allowed enrollment up to age 31 years. On AALL0434, participants were randomized to receive escalating dose methotrexate (CMTX) without leucovorin rescue + pegaspargase or high dose MTX (HDMTX) + leucovorin rescue. Intermediate and high-risk patients were randomized to receive or not receive six 5-day courses of nelarabine (Nel). Risk group assignments in AYA vs non-AYA patients can be found in Table 1. On AALL1231, participants were randomized to receive or not receive bortezomib in Induction and Delayed Intensification. Key differences between AALL0434 and AALL1231 ABFM backbones included the use of prednisone in induction in AALL0434 versus dexamethasone in AALL1231, and cranial radiation therapy in the majority of AALL0434 participants versus only in patients with central nervous system involvement in AALL1231. Results On AALL0434, the 4-year DFS for AYA was 81% compared to 84% for those <16 years old (P=0.5965), and OS was 88% and 90% respectively (P=0.3478). AYA patients randomized to CMTX (n=70) had a superior DFS compared to those randomized to HDMTX (n=72) with 4-year DFS 96% versus 78% respectively (P=0.0038). No disadvantage was seen among AYA subjects who received nelarabine versus those who did not, as shown by a 4-year DFS 85% versus 89%, respectively (N=54) (P=0.8116), albeit the sample size was small. On AALL1231, the 4-year EFS for AYA (n=107) was 82.7±3.9% compared to 82.2 ±1.7% for non-AYA (n=508) (P=0.727), and OS was 86.5 ±3.5% and 88.4 ±1.5% respectively (P=0.553). No difference in outcome was seen for AYA patients randomized to receive/not receive bortezomib. Combined outcome data for AALL0434 and AAL1231 demonstrates 4-year EFS for AYA (n=333) of 82.2+2.4% vs 83.9+0.9% for non-AYA (n=1844) (P=0.52) (Figure 1) and OS of 87.5+2.1% vs 90+0.8% respectively (P=0.19). Significant differences in patient characteristics in AALL0434 were higher initial white blood counts (P=0.0004) and higher risk group category (P=0.0002) for AYA patients. There were no significant differences in the AALL0434 AYA cohort compared to younger patients in CNS disease status, race, ethnicity, remission status at end of induction, or day 29 end of induction minimal residual disease (MRD). Toxicity rates were not significantly different in non-AYA vs AYA patients with the exception of upper respiratory infection (9.4% vs 1.8%; P=0.0001) and osteonecrosis (4.8% vs 17.7%; P<0.0001) in AALL0434. Rates of sepsis, catheter-related infection, and other infections were not significantly different between AYA and younger patients in AALL0434. Analysis of patient characteristics and toxicity rates in AALL1231, as well as analysis of the combined toxicity data for AALL0434 and AAL1231, are currently underway and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion COG AALL0434 and AALL1231 show outstanding overall outcomes for AYA patients with no significant difference in survival between AYA and non-AYA patients on either study, despite differences in the ABFM backbones and the higher risk features seen among the AYA group in AALL0434. There were similar occurrences of therapy-related toxicities for AYA and non-AYA study participants on AALL0434. Despite small numbers, CMTX holds a survival advantage for AYA T-ALL patients, with no survival disadvantage seen among AYA T-ALL patients who received Nel. Bortezomib does not offer significant benefit for AYA T-ALL patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».