MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389248161 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-174468

Childhood Treatment with Adeno-Associated Viral Gene Therapy Results in Stable FVIII Expression and Improved Bleeding Phenotype in Adult Severe Hemophilia A Dogs

2023· article· en· W4389248161 sur OpenAlexaff
Paul Batty, A. Ménard, Aomei Mo, Christine Brown, Ashrafali Mohamed Ismail, Bridget Yates, Laura L. Swystun, Lori Harpell, Abbey Pender, Andrew Winterborn, Sylvia Fong, David Lillicrap

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueVirus-based gene therapy research
Établissements canadiensKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenetic enhancementMedicineFactor IXAdeno-associated virusImmunologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyVector (molecular biology)Recombinant DNAGeneBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: In patients with severe hemophilia A, adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated factor VIII (FVIII) gene therapy is associated with reduced bleeding compared with FVIII prophylaxis. AAV5-FVIII gene therapy is approved in the U.S. and conditionally approved in Europe for the treatment of adults with severe hemophilia A. Gene therapy during childhood could potentially prevent the development of arthropathy and improve quality of life. However, there are unknowns regarding long-term safety and whether the predominant episomal nature of AAV persistence would lead to loss of transgene expression with hepatocyte divisions and liver expansion during childhood. The inflammatory response to AAV gene therapy in children is also largely uncharacterized. We have previously reported the treatment of five neonatal or infant dogs with a single vector infusion of a codon-optimized AAV5-B-domain deleted canine FVIII (cFVIII) construct with a hybrid liver promoter (AAV5-cFVIII). Dogs treated at 2 weeks of age demonstrated improved whole blood clot time (WBCT) over a 6-month period despite minimal cFVIII expression (<3%). Dogs treated at 2 months of age demonstrated stable cFVIII expression measured over a 6-month period and decreased WBCT. Aims: To describe the early inflammatory response to AAV5-cFVIII in infant and neonatal dogs, and to provide an update on the safety and efficacy of AAV5-cFVIII in these animals 12-16 months post-treatment. Methods: Hemophilia A dogs were treated with a single vector infusion (dose=2.0e14 vg/kg) of AAV5-cFVIII at 2 weeks (n=2) or 2 months (n=3) of age. Epigenomic data suggests that 2 months of age in dogs is equivalent to 9 months in humans. Liver volume was measured by magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months post-AAV5-cFVIII treatment. Plasma cytokine levels were measured using a cytokine array pre-treatment (day 0) and post-treatment (days 2-28). Percutaneous liver biopsy samples were obtained at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment. Results: Cytokine array analyses of samples demonstrated that one dog who received AAV5-cFVIII at 2 weeks experienced transient post-treatment plasma elevation of IL-6, KC-like, MCP-1, TGFβ-1, and TGFβ-2 that returned to baseline levels by day 18. Two dogs treated at 2 months experienced a transient increase in GMC-SF, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-18 that returned to baseline levels by day 21. No changes in levels of IFNγ, IL-8, IL-10, IP-10, TNFα, or TGFβ-3 were observed. Changes in plasma cytokine levels were not associated with an elevation in plasma alanine transaminase levels. Hemophilia A dogs treated with AAV5-cFVIII at 2 weeks of age maintained an improved WBCT 12 to 16 months post-treatment, although cFVIII expression as measured by one-stage (OSA) and chromogenic substrate assays (CSA) remained minimal (<3%). Body weight and liver volume increased by 10.6-fold (measured at 16 months) and 12-fold (measured at 12 months) respectively. Dogs treated with AAV5-cFVIII at 2 months of age demonstrated sustained cFVIII expression by OSA and CSA after 12 to 16 months (8.9-13.39% measured at 16 months by OSA), despite a 3.2-fold increase in body weight (measured at 16 months), and a 3.9-fold increase in liver volume (measured at 12 months). This was associated with improved WBCT observed over the 12 to 16-month period for all three dogs. Overall, a reduction in bleeding events (BEs) was observed in all dogs. No BEs were recorded prior to AAV5-cFVIII treatment for dogs treated at 2 weeks of age. During the 16 months post-treatment, one dog experienced two spontaneous BEs, while no BEs were observed for the second dog. The dogs treated at 2 months experienced 4 (3 spontaneous and 1 traumatic) BEs prior to AAV5-cFVIII treatment, and 1 traumatic BE 48 hours post-treatment prior to the detection of FVIII expression. For the remaining 16 months post-treatment, no BEs were observed in this group. Conclusions: Treatment using AAV5-cFVIII at 2 months of age in a hemophilia A dog model resulted in stable FVIII expression into adult life despite significant liver expansion. For some dogs, AAV-cFVIII treatment resulted in an early transient increase in plasma proinflammatory cytokine levels with no evidence of transaminitis that resolved within three weeks.Further studies on liver biopsy samples are ongoing to evaluate cellular implications, vector genome distribution, and mechanisms of AAV persistence.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetVirus-based gene therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→