MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389248186 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-190552

Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 at Time of Discharge from the Hospital Is Not Associated with an Improvement in Quality of Life: Results from the Activ 4c Clinical Trial

2023· article· en· W4389248186 sur OpenAlexaff
Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Taeim Kwon, Lana Wahid, Raj S. Kasthuri, Andrei Kindzelski, M. Margaret Knudson, Jerry A. Krishnan, Gervasio A. Lamas, Eric Leifere, José López‐Sendón, Peter Miller, Bela Patel, Alexandra Weissman, John G. Quigley, Deborah Siegal, Tracy Y Wang, Kevin J. Anstrom, Thomas L. Ortel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineApixabanPlaceboQuality of life (healthcare)Clinical trialRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineAnxietyPhysical therapyEmergency medicineRivaroxabanAtrial fibrillationWarfarin

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction. Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV2 infection, or PASC, is defined as the presence of persistent symptoms for at least two months after an acute infection with COVID-19. A potential pathophysiologic mechanism for PASC is microvascular thrombosis. Using EQ-5D-5L index scores, we previously reported that extended thromboprophylaxis for 30 days with apixaban did not impact quality of life (QoL) at 30 or 90 days after discharge (Wang et al, Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:515-523). The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether anticoagulation had a variable impact on the individual domains measured by EQ-5D-5L. Methods. ACTIV 4c was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial comparing post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily to placebo for 30 days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Participants were enrolled at 107 hospitals in the US between February 2021 and June 2022. We ascertained symptoms and QoL by EQ-5D-5L at 2 days, 30 days, and 90 days after hospital discharge by electronic or telephone follow-up. The five domains of EQ-5D-5L are: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain has 5 levels of response, ranging from “no problems/none” to “unable to perform/extreme”, which are used to determine individual scores. We analyzed the impact of treatment (placebo vs. apixaban), antiplatelet therapy (yes vs. no), and highest WHO severity score during hospitalization (score <5 vs. score ≥5) on degree of impairment at 2, 30, and 90 days post-discharge using a chi-square test for those participants who completed the survey at each timepoint. We also used a proportional odds model to test for at least moderate impairment in each EQ-5D-5L domain, also at 30 and 90 days, using odds ratios adjusted for age (restricted cubic spline with 3 knots), sex, D-dimer (normal or abnormal), BMI (restricted cubic spline with 3 knots), antiplatelet usage (yes/no - at enrollment), WHO severity score (<=5 vs. > 5), and the randomized treatment. Results. We randomized 1217 participants hospitalized with acute COVID-19 onto ACTIV 4c, with 610 participants assigned to apixaban and 607 participants to placebo. A total of 208 participants taking apixaban (43.5%) and 219 participants taking placebo (45.0%) reported moderate or greater impairment in one or more of the EQ-5D-5L domains by 2 days after hospital discharge. The individual domain most frequently reported as impaired was usual activities (33.0% of all study participants). By 30 days after discharge, 151 participants taking apixaban (30.8%) and 165 taking placebo (33.4%) reported moderate or greater impairment in one or more domains. The individual domain with the largest improvement was usual activities, affecting 17.4% of all study participants. By 90 days, 152 participants taking apixaban (31.5%) and 142 participants taking placebo (28.5%) reported moderate or greater impairment in one or more domains. Extended thromboprophylaxis with apixaban was not associated with improved scores for any of the individual EQ-5D-5L domains at 30 days or 90 days (Table 1). Stratification by WHO severity score during hospitalization revealed a significant improvement in the domain for usual activities for participants with score <5 compared to those with a score ≥5 (p=0.015) by 30 days, but this difference was not present by 90 days. Stratification by anti-platelet use did not identify any domains with improvement associated with antiplatelet therapy at 30 or 90 days. Using adjusted odds ratios, we did not find a benefit for apixaban at 30 days (Figure 1) or at 90 days (data not shown). Conclusion. Almost half of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have decreased QoL at time of discharge, with the greatest impact on performance of usual activities. Impaired QoL persists for up to 90 days after hospital discharge in one-third of patients. Extended thromboprophylaxis with apixaban for 30 days at the time of hospital discharge in participants with acute COVID-19 was not associated with improvements in QoL as assessed by EQ-5D-5L.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→Travaux en français237 207→