MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389248647 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-174774

Evaluating Sex-Based Hemoglobin Reference Intervals Using Strict Definitions of Health

2023· article· en· W4389248647 sur OpenAlexaff
Lauren E. Merz, Alexander Chaitoff, Angela C. Weyand, Michael Fralick, Michelle Sholzberg

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHemoglobinTransferrin saturationFerritinCohortAnemiaInternal medicinePopulationNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyIron deficiencyGastroenterologyEndocrinologyPhysiologyEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Hemoglobin reference intervals (RIs) are developed by laboratory assay manufacturers, and laboratories establish a RI using 120 “normal” samples when first implementing a new assay. Many institutions report different hemoglobin RIs for females and males with wide variation between institutions. Re-evaluation of hemoglobin RIs is warranted to ensure that optimal health for all patients is accurately represented. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, we evaluated the impact of excluding adults with chronic disease, iron deficiency (ID), inflammation, and red blood cell (RBC) disorders on hemoglobin lower limit of normal (LLN). Methods: Adults > 20 years in the NHANES from 2001-2006 and 2017-2020 were included. Demographic characteristics, self-reported medical history and medication use, and laboratory parameters were extracted. We generated hemoglobin distributions weighted to represent the population of the USA. From these distributions, 2.5%, 50%, and 97.5% values were individually and compositely evaluated when excluding chronic disease (defined as the healthy cohort), ID, inflammation, and RBC disorders. The healthy cohort excluded patients with a medical history of anemia, malignancy, current pregnancy, smoking, or liver, lung, kidney, or heart disease. Iron deficiency was defined as ferritin < 50 ng/mL, transferrin saturation (Tsat)<20%, or total iron binding capacity (TIBC) > 400 μg/dL. Inflammation was defined as ferritin>300 ng/mL, hs-CRP>1 mg/L, albumin<3.5 g/dL, white blood cells>10 K/uL, or TIBC<200 μg/dL. RBC disorders were defined as history of blood transfusion, MCV <80 or >100, Tsat>55%, MCHC >36, Mentzer index<13, or hydroxyurea or iron chelator use. Finally, we conducted several sensitivity analyses that assessed degree of ID at different levels of ferritin ranging from < 15 ng/mL to < 100 ng/mL. All analyses were conducted in R using the survey package. Results: There were 10,338 individuals in the total cohort, 5757 in the healthy cohort, and 1609 in the cohort with all exclusions applied. Among females, the hemoglobin LLN was 10.7g/dL in the total cohort, 10.6g/dL in the healthy cohort, 10.4g/dL in the cohort excluding inflammation, 11.7g/dL in the cohort excluding RBC disorders, 12.2g/dL in the cohort excluding ID, and 12.3g/dL in the cohort with all exclusions applied. Among males, the hemoglobin LLN was 12.5g/dL in the total cohort, 12.9g/dL in the healthy cohort, 12.9g/dL in the cohort excluding inflammation, 13.2g/dL in the cohort excluding RBC disorders, 13.0g/dL in the cohort excluding ID, and 13.3g/dL in the cohort with all exclusions applied. The difference between male and female hemoglobin LLN narrowed from 2.3g/dL (12.9g/dL vs 10.6g/dL) in the healthy cohort to 1g/dL (13.3g/dL vs 12.3g/dL) in the cohort with all exclusions applied. For males, the largest difference in hemoglobin LLN was seen when RBC disorders were excluded (12.9g/dL to 13.2g/dL; 0.3g/dL difference), and for females the greatest difference was seen when ID was excluded (10.6g/dL to 12.2g/dL; 1.6g/dL difference). Hemoglobin LLN by menopausal status for females and by age for males is shown in Figure 1. Pre-menopausal females had a significant increase in hemoglobin LLN when ID alone was excluded (10.3g/dL to 12.3g/dL), but this degree of change was not observed in healthy post-menopausal females or males. Degree of ID by ferritin level by sex and menopausal status or age is shown in Figure 2. Using a threshold of ferritin <30 ng/mL, 38.9% of pre-menopausal females were iron deficient compared with 10.3% of post-menopausal females and 3.5% of males. Discussion: Applying strict criteria for health and specifically excluding inflammation, RBC disorders, and ID resulted in higher hemoglobin LLN for both sexes and narrowed the difference in LLN between males and females. Pre-menopausal females had the most significant change in hemoglobin LLN from the healthy cohort to the cohort with all exclusions applied, and this was predominately driven by a very high prevalence of ID. ID is a pandemic that disproportionally impacts females of reproductive age. These findings emphasize the burden of ID and its systemic consequences, including normalization of anemia. It is imperative that institutions rigorously and thoughtfully define their hemoglobin RIs by ensuring that strict definitions of health are applied with an emphasis on excluding those with ID.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,039
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,104
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,205

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0390,104
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,200
Tête enseignante GPT0,388
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207